Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2025

Flow Cytometry-based Assay for the Monitoring of NK Cell Functions
Published on: October 30, 2016
Current Status of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping of Hematolymphoid Neoplasms in Korea
Mikyoung Park1, Jihyang Lim1, Ari Ahn2
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Insights
Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) practices in Korea show significant variation. Standardization of FCI-HLN is crucial for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of hematolymphoid neoplasms.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Immunology
- Clinical Pathology
Background:
- Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) is vital for diagnosing, classifying, and monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD).
- Current FCI-HLN practices often rely on in-house protocols, leading to a need for standardization.
- This study addresses the need for standardization by surveying current FCI-HLN practices in Korea.
Purpose of the Study:
- To survey the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea.
- To gather fundamental data for improving the quality and standardization of FCI-HLN.
- To identify areas of heterogeneity in FCI-HLN protocols.
Main Methods:
- A survey was conducted among eight university hospitals in Korea that perform FCI-HLN.
- A questionnaire was used to gather information on test items, reagents, fluorophores, sample and reagent amounts, cell acquisition numbers, isotype control usage, and reporting criteria.
- Data on panel usage for various hematolymphoid neoplasms and MRD were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Most participating hospitals utilize panels for acute and chronic hematolymphoid neoplasms, plasma cell neoplasms, and MRD.
- Significant heterogeneity was observed in the number of antibodies used (up to 32 for acute HLN), fluorophores (4-10), sample amounts, reagent amounts, and acquisition cell numbers.
- Most hospitals used a 20% positive criterion, with variations in isotype control usage and reporting of limit of detection/quantification for MRD.
Conclusions:
- This is the first comprehensive study detailing the current state of FCI-HLN in Korea.
- The findings highlight considerable heterogeneity and complexity in FCI-HLN practices across Korean hospitals.
- Urgent need for standardization of FCI-HLN is emphasized, with the study providing a basis for developing standard guidelines.
Background:
Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of hematolymphoid neoplasms (FCI-HLN) is essential for diagnosis, classification, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. FCI-HLN is typically performed using in-house protocols, raising the need for standardization. Therefore, we surveyed the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea to obtain fundamental data for quality improvement and standardization.
Methods:
Eight university hospitals actively conducting FCI-HLN participated in our survey. We analyzed responses to a questionnaire that included inquiries regarding test items, reagent antibodies (RAs), fluorophores, sample amounts (SAs), reagent antibody amounts (RAAs), acquisition cell number (ACN), isotype control (IC) usage, positive/negative criteria, and reporting.
Results:
Most hospitals used acute HLN, chronic HLN, plasma cell neoplasm (PCN), and MRD panels. The numbers of RAs were heterogeneous, with a maximum of 32, 26, 12, 14, and 10 antibodies used for acute HLN, chronic HLN, PCN, ALL-MRD, and multiple myeloma-MRD, respectively. The number of fluorophores ranged from 4 to 10. RAs, SAs, RAAs, and ACN were diverse. Most hospitals used a positive criterion of 20%, whereas one used 10% for acute and chronic HLN panels. Five hospitals used ICs for the negative criterion. Positive/negative assignments, percentages, and general opinions were commonly reported. In MRD reporting, the limit of detection and lower limit of quantification were included.
Conclusions:
This is the first comprehensive study on the current status of FCI-HLN in Korea, confirming the high heterogeneity and complexity of FCI-HLN practices. Standardization of FCI-HLN is urgently needed. The findings provide a reference for establishing standard FCI-HLN guidelines.
More Related Videos
12:05Database-guided Flow-cytometry for Evaluation of Bone Marrow Myeloid Cell Maturation
Published on: November 3, 2018
09:01Flow Cytometry to Estimate Leukemia Stem Cells in Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia and in Patient-derived-xenografts, at Diagnosis and Follow Up
Published on: March 26, 2018