Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 19, 2026

Intraductal Injection of LPS as a Mouse Model of Mastitis: Signaling Visualized via an NF-κB Reporter Transgenic
Published on: September 4, 2012
Validity of luminometry and bacteriological tests for diagnosing intramammary infection at dry-off in dairy cows
J Denis-Robichaud1, N Barbeau-Grégoire2, M-L Gauthier3
1Independent researcher, Amqui, Québec, Canada G5J 2N5.
Insights
This study found that laboratory culture, Petrifilm, and Tri-Plate tests are valid for identifying intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy cows at dry-off, unlike luminometry. Bacteriological tests offer reliable diagnosis for IMI in dairy herds.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Medicine
- Dairy Science
- Diagnostic Microbiology
Background:
- Accurate diagnosis of intramammary infections (IMI) in dairy cows at dry-off is crucial for effective herd management and milk quality.
- Various diagnostic methods, including laboratory culture, on-farm culture systems (Petrifilm, Tri-Plate), and luminometry, are used, but their comparative validity is not fully established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the diagnostic validity (sensitivity and specificity) of laboratory culture, Petrifilm, Tri-Plate, and luminometry for detecting IMI in dairy cows at dry-off.
- To evaluate the predictive values and misclassification costs of these tests under different prevalence scenarios and false negative-to-false-positive ratios.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 333 Holstein dairy cows before dry-off.
- Milk samples were divided for luminometry, Petrifilm, Tri-Plate, and laboratory culture.
- Bayesian latent class analysis was used to estimate test performance, considering all tests imperfect.
Main Results:
- Luminometry demonstrated poor validity for IMI detection at dry-off.
- Laboratory culture (Se: 0.93, Sp: 0.69), Petrifilm (Se: 0.91, Sp: 0.71), and Tri-Plate (Se: 0.65, Sp: 0.85) showed adequate validity.
- Bacteriological tests had comparable positive predictive values, but Tri-Plate had lower negative predictive values than laboratory culture and Petrifilm at higher IMI prevalence.
Conclusions:
- Bacteriological tests (laboratory culture, Petrifilm, Tri-Plate) are valid for diagnosing IMI in dairy cows at dry-off.
- Luminometry is not a reliable method for IMI detection at dry-off.
- Petrifilm and Tri-Plate offer comparable performance to laboratory culture, with suitability depending on prevalence and the relative importance of false negatives versus false positives.
Abstract:
The objective of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the validity of laboratory culture, Petrifilm and Tri-Plate on-farm culture systems, as well as luminometry to correctly identify IMI at dry-off in dairy cows, considering all tests to be imperfect. From September 2020 until December 2021, we collected composite milk samples from cows before dry-off and divided them into 4 aliquots for luminometry, Petrifilm (aerobic count), Tri-Plate, and laboratory culture tests. We assessed multiple thresholds of relative light units (RLU) for luminometry, and we used thresholds of ≥100 cfu/mL for the laboratory culture, ≥50 cfu/mL for Petrifilm, and ≥1 cfu for Tri-Plate tests. We fitted Bayesian latent class analysis models to estimate the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) for each test to identify IMI, with 95% credibility interval (BCI). Using different prevalence measures (0.30, 0.50, and 0.70), we calculated the predictive values (PV) and misclassification cost terms (MCT) at different false negative-to-false-positive ratios (FN:FP). A total of 333 cows were enrolled in the study from one commercial Holstein herd. The validity of the luminometry was poor for all thresholds, with an Se of 0.51 (95% BCI = 0.43-0.59) and Sp of 0.38 (95% BCI = 0.26-0.50) when using a threshold of ≥150 RLU. The laboratory culture had an Se of 0.93 (95% BCI = 0.85-0.98) and Sp of 0.69 (95% BCI = 0.49-0.89); the Petrifilm had an Se of 0.91 (95% BCI = 0.80-0.98) and Sp of 0.71 (95% BCI = 0.51-0.90); and the Tri-Plate had an Se of 0.65 (95% BCI = 0.53-0.82) and Sp of 0.85 (95% BCI = 0.66-0.97). Bacteriological tests had good PV, with comparable positive PV for all 3 tests, but lower negative PV for the Tri-Plate compared with the laboratory culture and the Petrifilm. For a prevalence of IMI of 0.30, all 3 tests had similar MCT, but for prevalence of 0.50 and 0.70, the Tri-Plate had higher MCT in scenarios where leaving a cow with IMI untreated is considered to have greater detrimental effects than treating a healthy cow (i.e., FN:FP of 3:1). Our results showed that the bacteriological tests have adequate validity to diagnose IMI at dry-off, but luminometry does not. We concluded that although luminometry is not useful to identify IMI at dry-off, the Petrifilm and Tri-Plate tests performed similarly to laboratory culture, depending on the prevalence and importance of the FP and FN results.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Automated Microbial Diagnostics

