A systematic review of procedural and sampling techniques for cryobiopsy in interstitial lung disease

Julia A Lachowicz1,2, Natasha E Smallwood3,4, Jyotika D Prasad5,4,6,7

  • 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia julia.lachowicz@mh.org.au.

Insights

Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) offers an 81% diagnostic yield for interstitial lung disease (ILD). Procedural factors like general anesthesia and probe size significantly impact TBLC

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Interventional Pulmonology
  • Diagnostic Procedures

Background:

  • Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) serves as an alternative to surgical lung biopsy for diagnosing interstitial lung disease (ILD) with low confidence.
  • Current literature on TBLC's diagnostic performance and safety, particularly concerning procedural and sampling techniques, requires synthesis.
  • Unclassifiable ILD necessitates reliable histopathological evaluation methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize current literature on the diagnostic performance and safety of TBLC.
  • To focus on the impact of procedural and sampling techniques on TBLC outcomes.
  • To identify factors influencing the diagnostic yield and complication rates of TBLC.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic meta-analysis of studies published up to April 11, 2022, was conducted.
  • Included studies focused on adults with unclassifiable ILD, reporting diagnostic yield, complications, and TBLC techniques.
  • Meta-analyses were performed for diagnostic yield, pneumothorax, and bleeding, with subgroup analyses assessing methodological variables.

Main Results:

  • The overall diagnostic yield of TBLC was 81% (95% CI 79-83%), with improved yield associated with general anesthesia, multidisciplinary ILD meetings, a 2.4 mm cryoprobe, and higher lung function parameters.
  • Pneumothorax occurred in 5% (95% CI 4-5%) of cases, with increased rates linked to the 2.4 mm cryoprobe, routine post-procedure imaging, and multiple lobe sampling.
  • Moderate-to-severe bleeding occurred in 12% (11-14%) of cases, with higher rates associated with the 2.4 mm cryoprobe and specific bleeding score selections.

Conclusions:

  • Patient characteristics and modifiable factors, including procedural and anesthetic techniques, significantly influence TBLC's diagnostic yield and safety in unclassifiable ILD.
  • These variables contribute to the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes observed with TBLC.
  • Individualized clinical decision-making and future guideline development should consider these factors, and routine reporting in research is warranted.
Abstract