Pathological features of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease in transbronchial

Andrew Churg1, Venerino Poletti2, Claudia Ravaglia2

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of British Columbia, and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Histopathology
|September 2, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Transbronchial cryobiopsies can help diagnose interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Specific patterns like non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) favor connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD), but usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patterns are hard to distinguish.

Area of Science:

  • Pulmonology
  • Pathology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Transbronchial cryobiopsies are increasingly utilized for diagnosing interstitial lung diseases (ILD).
  • Limited data exists on distinguishing specific ILD patterns within cryobiopsies.
  • Pathological guidelines are needed to differentiate common ILDs in cryobiopsy specimens.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish pathological guidelines for differentiating usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP), and connective tissue disease-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) using transbronchial cryobiopsies.
  • To analyze the frequency of specific histopathological patterns in cryobiopsies from patients with established CTD-ILD, IPF, and FHP.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 120 transbronchial cryobiopsies from patients with multidisciplinary discussion (MDD)-confirmed CTD-ILD.
  • Comparison with a previous cohort of 121 cryobiopsies from patients with MDD-confirmed IPF or FHP.
  • Evaluation of histopathological patterns including non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), NSIP with organizing pneumonia (OP), and UIP patterns.

Main Results:

  • Non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) alone (30%) and NSIP with organizing pneumonia (OP) (24%) were significantly more frequent in CTD-ILD cases, favoring this diagnosis.
  • A usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern was identified in a majority of FHP (54%) and IPF (71%) cases, supporting these diagnoses.
  • While interstitial giant cells suggested FHP or CTD-ILD over IPF, they were infrequent. Lymphoid aggregates and fibroblast foci counts did not differentiate UIP patterns among the studied ILDs.

Conclusions:

  • Pathological findings of NSIP, particularly NSIP with OP, in cryobiopsies strongly suggest CTD-ILD in the appropriate clinical context.
  • Distinguishing CTD-ILD with a UIP pattern, FHP with UIP, and IPF based solely on cryobiopsy findings remains challenging.
  • Cryobiopsy interpretation requires integration with clinical and radiological data for accurate ILD diagnosis.
Abstract