Flow cytometry of non-hematopoietic cells in canine effusions

Federica Sini1, Maverick Melega1, Francesca Tiziana Cannizzo1

  • 1Department of Veterinary Sciences, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, University of Turin, Grugliasco, TO, Italy.

PubMed

Insights

Flow cytometry offers a faster alternative to immunohistochemistry for identifying non-hematopoietic cells in canine effusions using cytokeratin, vimentin, and desmin markers. While generally concordant, flow cytometry may have lower sensitivity for vimentin detection.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Cytopathology
  • Immunophenotyping
  • Flow Cytometry

Background:

  • Identifying non-hematopoietic cells in effusions is diagnostically challenging in veterinary cytology.
  • Immunohistochemistry on smears or cell blocks are common ancillary tests.
  • Cavitary effusions are suitable for flow cytometry analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate flow cytometry as an alternative to immunohistochemistry for detecting cytokeratin (CK), vimentin (VIM), and desmin (DES) in canine effusions.
  • To assess the concordance between flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry for these markers.
  • To establish a flow cytometric panel for differentiating cell origins (epithelial, mesothelial, mesenchymal).

Main Methods:

  • Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry were performed on 36 canine effusions.
  • Expression of CK, VIM, and DES was determined using both methods.
  • A panel interpretation was used to classify cell origins: epithelial (CK+VIM-DES-), mesothelial (CK+VIM+DES+), or mesenchymal (CK-VIM+DES-).

Main Results:

  • Perfect concordance (100%) for CK, substantial for VIM (77.8%), and almost perfect for DES (97.2%) between flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry.
  • Panel interpretation concordance was 75%.
  • Flow cytometry showed potentially lower sensitivity for VIM detection, with observed high VIM expression in epithelial cells and variable VIM in mesothelial cells.

Conclusions:

  • Flow cytometry is a time-saving alternative to immunohistochemistry for detecting CK, VIM, and DES in canine effusions.
  • The flow cytometric panel is largely concordant with immunohistochemistry but requires careful interpretation, especially for VIM.
  • Further multicentric studies are needed to confirm findings and establish diagnostic utility.