Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2025

An Ex vivo Mast Cell Degranulation Assay using Crude Peritoneal Exudate Cells and Natural Antigen Stimulation
Published on: April 27, 2021
Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome in real-life practice: clinical features and management
Insights
Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (iMCAS) causes severe anaphylaxis. Omalizumab effectively prevents these episodes, significantly reducing symptom severity and frequency in patients unresponsive to other treatments.
Area of Science:
- Allergy and Immunology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (iMCAS) is a rare condition with non-standardized treatment approaches.
- Patients often experience severe, life-threatening anaphylaxis episodes.
- Current treatments may be insufficient for managing iMCAS symptoms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the clinical characteristics of iMCAS.
- To assess the efficacy of omalizumab as a treatment for iMCAS.
- To determine the potential role of omalizumab in clinical practice for iMCAS management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective evaluation of 21 iMCAS patients.
- Recording of anaphylaxis episodes, symptom severity (VAS), and disease control (Likert scale) at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year.
- Analysis of treatment regimens, including the use of omalizumab.
Main Results:
- iMCAS frequently affects skin, respiratory, cardiovascular, and neurologic systems.
- 90.5% of patients experienced grade V anaphylaxis and required omalizumab due to treatment unresponsiveness.
- Omalizumab significantly reduced anaphylaxis episodes and symptom severity (VAS scores) while improving disease control (Likert scale) within 1 year.
Conclusions:
- iMCAS is associated with severe anaphylaxis.
- Omalizumab demonstrates significant success in preventing anaphylaxis episodes in iMCAS patients.
- Omalizumab serves as a valuable add-on therapy for managing iMCAS, improving patient outcomes.
Abstract:
Background: Idiopathic mast cell activation syndrome (iMCAS) is a rare challenging diagnosis, and its treatment is not well standardized. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical features of iMCAS and the potential need of omalizumab in clinical practice. Methods: The clinical features and treatment regimens in 21 patients with iMCAS were evaluated. The number of anaphylaxis episodes, symptom severity scores via the visual analog scale (VAS), the disease control via the Likert scale were recorded at baseline, 6th-month and 1st-year visits. Results: The affected organ systems were the skin (100%), respiratory (90%), cardiovascular (76.2%), and neurologic (40%). Nineteen patients (90.5%) experienced a grade V anaphylaxis and received adrenaline at baseline. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) serum tryptase level during an episode and at baseline were 11.7 ng/mL (10.4-14.6 ng/mL) and 5.29 ng/mL (3.32-8.62 ng/mL), respectively. Nineteen patients (90.5%) required omalizumab due to unresponsiveness to other treatments at a median (IQR) duration of 3 years (1-4 years). By the end of 1 year, nine patients (47.4%) continued on 150 mg, seven patients (36.8%) continued on 300 mg, two patients (10.5%) continued on 450 mg, and one patient (5.2%) continued on 600 mg of omalizumab. Overall, the VAS scores significantly decreased at the 6th month and 1st year of omalizumab treatment compared to both the time of diagnosis (6th month vs. diagnosis: p = 0.001; 1st year vs. diagnosis: p = 0.012) and the initiation of omalizumab treatment (6th month vs. initiation: p = 0.001; 1st year vs. initiation: p = 0.001). The number of anaphylaxis episodes was significantly higher at the time of diagnosis compared with the 6th month (p = 0.001) and 1st year (p = 0.001) of omalizumab treatment and the number of anaphylaxis episodes at the initiation of omalizumab treatment was significantly higher compared with the 6th month of omalizumab treatment (p = 0.001) and the 1st year of omalizumab treatment (p = 0.001). Symptom control levels on the Likert scale at the 6th month and 1st year of omalizumab treatment were found to be significantly higher compared to both the time of diagnosis (6th month vs. diagnosis: p = 0.001; 1st year vs. diagnosis: p = 0.001) and the initiation of omalizumab treatment (6th month vs. initiation: p = 0.001; 1st year vs. initiation: p = 0.001). Conclusion: The iMCAS causes severe anaphylaxis episodes that can be successfully prevented by omalizumab as an add-on treatment to other treatment options.
Related Concept Videos
Antiasthma Drugs: Mast Cell Stabilizers and Anti-IgE Drugs
Mast cell stabilizers, such as cromolyn (also known as sodium cromoglycate) and nedocromil (Tilade), are effective drugs in asthma management. These stabilizers hinder histamine release by skillfully obstructing the activation of mast cells and other cellular entities. Notably, they navigate this task without...
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Allergic Reactions
Hypersensitivities
Types of Hypersensitivities
Hypersensitivity reactions are categorized into four types: Type 1, Type 2, Type 3, and Type 4. Each type has a distinct mechanism...

