Artificial intelligence-assisted HER2 interpretation for breast cancers in a multi-laboratory study

Libo Yang1,2, Jie Chen2, Leyi Gao1,2

  • 1Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Gland Surgery
|July 17, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Manual interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) shows low concordance, especially for HER2 1+ cases. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interpretation improves agreement in multi-laboratory studies.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Pathology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Improving concordance in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) examinations across laboratories is a persistent challenge.
  • HER2 testing is critical for guiding breast cancer treatment decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the concordance of HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) examination using manual versus artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted interpretation in a multi-laboratory setting.
  • To identify factors contributing to discrepancies in HER2 scoring.

Main Methods:

  • A tissue microarray (TMA) of 53 breast cancer samples was distributed to 35 laboratories for manual HER2 IHC scoring.
  • Cases with discordant manual interpretations were re-evaluated using an AI-assisted microscope.

Main Results:

  • Only 26.4% of cases showed concordant manual HER2 IHC results across all laboratories, with significant issues in HER2 1+ scoring.
  • AI-assisted interpretation resolved complete agreement in 35.9% of previously non-concordant cases.
  • Discrepancies were significantly more frequent in manually scored 1+ sections compared to 0 sections.

Conclusions:

  • Weak staining in HER2 1+ breast cancers contributes to poor manual interpretation agreement.
  • AI-assisted HER2 interpretation offers a robust solution to mitigate subjective errors and enhance multi-laboratory study concordance.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos