Diagnosis and management of immune effector cell-associated enterocolitis after ciltacabtagene autoleucel
Kenneth Jc Lim1, Hee Eun Lee2, Zongming Eric Chen2
1Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Insights
Immune effector cell-associated enterocolitis (IEC-EC) after CAR-T therapy presents with severe diarrhea and poor outcomes. Early diagnosis and biologic therapy show promise for managing this condition.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Gastroenterology
Background:
- Immune effector cell-associated enterocolitis (IEC-EC) is a serious complication following ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) CAR-T therapy.
- IEC-EC is poorly characterized and associated with poor patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the clinical features, risk factors, and management strategies for IEC-EC after cilta-cel CAR-T therapy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 229 patients treated with cilta-cel.
- Detailed review of clinical presentation, diagnostic findings (including duodenal biopsies), and treatment responses.
Main Results:
- 3.9% of patients developed grade 3 IEC-EC, characterized by non-resolving diarrhea.
- Risk factors included high-risk disease, prolonged cytokine release syndrome, and delayed neurotoxicity.
- First-line therapies showed poor response, while biologic therapy (vedolizumab, infliximab) induced durable responses in patients without gastrointestinal coinfections.
Conclusions:
- Early gastroenterology consultation and duodenal biopsy are crucial for diagnosing IEC-EC.
- Biologic therapy should be considered early for patients with refractory IEC-EC, particularly those without coinfections.
Abstract:
Immune effector cell-associated enterocolitis (IEC-EC) has been observed after ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel [Carvykti]) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. It is associated with dismal outcomes and is poorly characterized. Here, we examined its clinical features, risk factors, and proposed management strategies. Among the 229 consecutive patients who received cilta-cel at Mayo Clinic, 9 (3.9%) presented with a nonresolving, nonbloody, grade 3 diarrhea, often requiring prolonged total parenteral nutrition. Gastrointestinal coinfections were seen in most patients. Median time from CAR-T infusion to symptom onset was 85 days (range, 35-166), and there appeared to be a latency from symptom onset to endoscopic evaluation. Histopathology findings resembling a graft-versus-host disease pattern of mucosal injury were most seen on duodenal biopsies, whereas 2 cases had patterns akin to a T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder (1 CD4+ and 1 CD8+). Independent associated factors for IEC-EC included high-risk disease as defined by the International Myeloma Society and International Myeloma Working Group, prolonged cytokine release syndrome, and antecedent delayed neurotoxicity. Response to first-line therapy comprising IV or oral corticosteroids, bile acid sequestrants, IV immunoglobulin, and antimicrobial-directed therapy was poor, with no durable responses. Biologic therapy appeared to induce durable responses in 3 of the 5 patients (2/2 vedolizumab; 1/3 infliximab); none of the responders had gastrointestinal coinfection. Early gastroenterology input for endoscopic evaluation with the inclusion of duodenal biopsy is a key component for diagnosis. Early institution of biologic therapy after failure of a short course of corticosteroids should be considered.

![Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F62334.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
