Sodium Alginate and Plasma Thrombin Methods of Cell Block Preparation in Body Fluid Cytology: A Comparative Study

Amrutha Anitha Ponnamkottu1, Debasis Gochhait1, Rashmi P Joshi1

  • 1Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, Puducherry, India.

Insights

Sodium alginate (SA) cell blocks offer a cost-effective alternative to plasma thrombin (PT) for effusion fluid cytology. While SA shows comparable cellularity and cytomorphology, it presents artefacts, yet remains suitable for diagnosis and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Area of Science:

  • Cytopathology
  • Histopathology
  • Biomaterial Science

Background:

  • Cytology laboratories process numerous effusion fluid samples, making cell block preparation with immunohistochemistry (IHC) essential.
  • The standard plasma thrombin (PT) method for cell block preparation is costly, necessitating a more economical alternative.
  • This study evaluates sodium alginate (SA) as a potential cost-effective substitute for PT in effusion cytology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of sodium alginate (SA) and plasma thrombin (PT) methods for effusion cell block preparation.
  • To assess the agreement between SA and PT methods regarding cellularity, cytomorphology, and artefact presence.
  • To determine the feasibility of using SA cell blocks for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and routine cytology diagnostics.

Main Methods:

  • Seventy-six effusion fluid samples were analyzed.
  • Cell blocks were prepared using both the routine PT method and the SA method.
  • Haematoxylin and Eosin stained sections were blindly evaluated by two cytopathologists for cellularity, cytomorphology, and artefacts.

Main Results:

  • Both SA and PT methods demonstrated comparable performance in terms of cellularity and cytomorphology.
  • Satisfactory cellularity was achieved in 96.0% of SA cases versus 93.4% of PT cases.
  • While SA blocks showed a gel-like artefact, it did not impede diagnosis, and IHC staining yielded excellent results.

Conclusions:

  • Sodium alginate (SA) cell blocks are a viable and cost-effective alternative to plasma thrombin (PT) for effusion cytology.
  • SA method provides comparable diagnostic quality to PT, with artefacts not affecting diagnostic interpretation.
  • SA cell blocks are suitable for immunohistochemistry (IHC) and routine cytology, especially in resource-limited settings.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos