Resin embedding for quantitative immunoelectron microscopy. A comparative computerized image analysis

S Eneström1, B Kniola

  • 1Department of Pathology I, Linköping University, Sweden.

Insights

Comparing embedding methods for quantitative immunoelectron microscopy (QIEM) revealed Epon embedding offers more consistent results than Lowicryl K4M for rat secretory granules. This ensures reliable data for scientific research.

Area of Science:

  • Electron microscopy
  • Cell biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Quantitative immunoelectron microscopy (QIEM) relies heavily on preparative techniques for accurate results.
  • Variability in immunolabeling and quantitative data can arise from different embedding and dehydration methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare Lowicryl K4M and Epon embedding for QIEM of rat somatotrophic secretory granules.
  • To assess the impact of preparative techniques on labeling intensity, granule morphology, and image contrast.

Main Methods:

  • Rat somatotrophic secretory granules were identically fixed and dehydrated.
  • Samples were embedded using Lowicryl K4M and Epon.
  • Computer-assisted image analysis measured labeling intensity, diameter, roundness, uranyl acetate uptake, and gray values.

Main Results:

  • Lowicryl K4M showed higher labeling densities but inconsistent results.
  • Epon embedding, especially with cryofixation and physical dehydration, yielded lower but more uniform immunostaining.
  • Epon sections demonstrated better contrast and distinct granule surface reliefs.

Conclusions:

  • Epon embedding provides greater reliability and reproducibility for QIEM compared to Lowicryl K4M.
  • Thorough comparison of preparative techniques is crucial for valid QIEM studies.