Influence of laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy upon cell-mediated immunity

J P Griffith1, N J Everitt, F Lancaster

  • 1Leeds Institute for Minimally Invasive Therapy, General Infirmary, UK.

Insights

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy causes less immune suppression than open surgery. This study found T-lymphocyte proliferation was preserved after laparoscopic procedures, unlike open surgery, indicating better cell-mediated immunity.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Cellular Biology

Background:

  • Surgery, trauma, and anesthesia can cause temporary immunosuppression.
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers clinical benefits over traditional open surgery, potentially due to a smaller wound size and reduced acute phase response.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy on cell-mediated immunity.
  • To compare T-lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell cytotoxicity between the two surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed T-lymphocyte proliferation using in vitro assays with mitogens (phytohaemagglutinin, staphylococcal enterotoxin B, toxic shock syndrome toxin).
  • Measured natural killer (NK) cell cytotoxicity via a standard 51Cr release assay.
  • Collected blood samples pre-operatively and 24 hours post-operatively from patients undergoing either laparoscopic (n=21) or open (n=13) cholecystectomy.

Main Results:

  • Open cholecystectomy significantly depressed T-lymphocyte proliferation post-operatively (P < 0.002 to P = 0.01).
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy did not significantly depress T-lymphocyte proliferation.
  • A minor, statistically insignificant decrease in NK cell cytotoxicity was observed in both groups.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to cause less depression of cell-mediated immunity compared to open cholecystectomy.
  • The findings suggest a potential immunological advantage for the laparoscopic approach in cholecystectomy patients.