Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
Studying the Stoichiometry of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Intact Cells using Correlative Microscopy
Published on: September 11, 2015
The determination of comparable labeling densities in quantitative immunoelectron microscopic double labeling studies
Insights
Probe size impacts colloidal gold immunocytochemistry labeling intensity unpredictably. Comparable labeling densities can be achieved by calculating and applying an antigen-specific probe size correction factor.
Area of Science:
- Electron microscopy
- Immunocytochemistry
- Quantitative analysis
Background:
- Colloidal gold immunocytochemistry is vital for ultrastructural research.
- Labeling intensity is influenced by probe size, affecting quantitative accuracy.
- Standardized protocols are needed to mitigate probe size variability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of probe size on labeling intensity in quantitative ultrastructural studies.
- To develop a method for obtaining comparable labeling densities across different probe sizes.
- To establish a probe size correction factor for accurate antigen quantification.
Main Methods:
- Utilized postembedded indirect two-sided double labeling and single labeling protocols.
- Studied labeling characteristics of four antigens with two common probe sizes.
- Calculated antigen-specific probe size correction factors from single-label studies on serial sections.
Main Results:
- Labeling intensity variation due to probe size was unpredictable when only accounting for size.
- Comparable labeling densities were achieved by determining single-label intensities and applying a correction factor.
- The calculated probe size correction factor enabled consistent relative abundance measurements.
Conclusions:
- Probe size is a critical, unpredictable variable in quantitative immunogold labeling.
- A method involving single-label calibration and a correction factor can standardize labeling intensity.
- This approach enhances the reliability of quantitative ultrastructural immunocytochemistry.
Abstract:
In quantitative ultrastructural studies using colloidal gold immunocytochemical techniques, labeling intensities vary according to the size of the probe used. Using postembedded indirect two-sided double labeling and single labeling protocols, the labeling characteristics of four antigens were studied using two probe sizes commonly used in double labeling studies. It was determined that the labeling intensity variation resulting from the use of different probe sizes was unpredictable after correcting for the increased probe size alone. It was possible, however, to obtain comparable labeling densities by first determining the labeling intensities for each probe size with its antigen in single label studies on serial sections and using the same procedure as the double labeling studies. A probe size correction factor for each antigen was calculated from these data. This factor was used to obtain comparable measurements of the relative abundance of each label.
