Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026
Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 17, 2013
Observer variability in the histopathological reporting of abnormal rectal biopsy specimens
A M Lessells1, J S Beck, R A Burnett
1Department of Pathology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Insights
Pathologists showed good consistency in diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from rectal biopsies. They also accurately identified pseudomembranous colitis and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, though infective colitis diagnosis was less consistent.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Pathology
- Histopathology
Background:
- Rectal biopsy interpretation is crucial for diagnosing gastrointestinal conditions.
- Variability in diagnostic reporting can impact patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the inter-observer agreement among consultant pathologists in interpreting abnormal rectal biopsy specimens.
- To evaluate the consistency in differentiating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from other abnormalities.
Main Methods:
- A panel of 11 consultant pathologists reviewed 60 rectal biopsy specimens from patients with bloody diarrhea.
- Pathologists used a standardized proforma listing 12 diagnostic categories and 22 features.
Main Results:
- Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was diagnosed in 41 cases, with 33 receiving consensus from at least nine pathologists.
- Ulcerative colitis was recognized more consistently than Crohn's disease.
- Pseudomembranous colitis and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome were well-recognized, but infective colitis diagnosis showed lower agreement.
Conclusions:
- Consultant pathologists demonstrate satisfactory consistency in diagnosing IBD and specific non-IBD conditions from rectal biopsies.
- The study highlights areas of diagnostic strength and potential challenges in rectal biopsy interpretation.
Aims:
To study the consistency of reporting of abnormal rectal biopsy specimens, especially in the differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease from other causes of abnormality.
Methods:
Sixty rectal biopsy specimens were identified from patients presenting with bloody diarrhoea. These were then circulated to the 11 consultant pathologists in the study who filled in a proforma with a list of 12 diagnostic categories and 22 features.
Results:
Forty one of the 60 cases were examples of inflammatory bowel disease. In 33 of these cases nine or more pathologists had made the diagnosis. Further categorisation into ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease showed better recognition of ulcerative colitis. In the 19 cases of non-inflammatory bowel disease recognition of pseudomembranous colitis and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome was good, but the results were poorer in the case of infective colitis.
Conclusion:
The findings suggest that a group of consultant pathologists can differentiate between inflammatory bowel disease and other causes of an abnormal rectal biopsy specimen and can also recognise pseudomembranous colitis and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome satisfactorily.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
01:25Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...