Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026
Label-Free Identification of Lymphocyte Subtypes Using Three-Dimensional Quantitative Phase Imaging and Machine Learning
Published on: November 19, 2018
Comparison between dual and tri-colour reagents for the analysis of lymphocyte subsets
J S Dhaliwal1, C K Quek, T Balasubramaniam
1Division of Immunology, Institute for Medical Research, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Insights
This study compared dual and tri-color reagents for lymphocyte immunophenotyping. Tri-color reagents offer an advantage in analyzing complex samples, showing significant differences in Natural Killer (NK) cell detection.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Lymphocyte immunophenotyping is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring various diseases.
- Dual-color flow cytometry has been a standard method, but limitations exist with complex samples.
- Advancements in multi-color flow cytometry offer enhanced analytical capabilities.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of dual-color versus tri-color reagents in lymphocyte immunophenotyping.
- To identify any significant differences in cell population quantification between the two methods.
- To evaluate the advantages of tri-color reagents in challenging clinical specimens.
Main Methods:
- Concurrent immunophenotyping of 37 patient and normal specimens using both dual and tri-color reagents.
- Analysis of cell populations including CD3, CD4, CD19, and Natural Killer (NK) cells.
- Statistical comparison of results using the paired t-test.
Main Results:
- No significant differences were observed for CD3, CD4, and CD19 cell populations between dual and tri-color methods.
- A statistically significant difference was found in the quantification of the NK cell component (18.3% vs 16.3%).
- Tri-color immunophenotyping demonstrated superior ability to analyze specimens with debris or non-lymphocytic cell contamination.
Conclusions:
- Dual and tri-color reagents provide comparable results for major lymphocyte subsets (CD3, CD4, CD19).
- Tri-color reagents show a significant difference in NK cell quantification and offer improved gating strategies.
- The enhanced analytical capability of tri-color immunophenotyping is advantageous for complex or contaminated samples in clinical diagnostics.
Abstract:
The aim of this project was to compare dual and tri-colour reagents for lymphocyte immunophenotyping. A total of 37 patient and normal specimens were immunophenotyped concurrently with the following mean values (% dual vs tri-colour): CD3 (69.4 vs 68.3) CD4 (24.0 vs 24.2) and CD19 (13.9 vs 12.6). A comparison of the results obtained using the paired t test showed that there were no significant differences for cells expressing CD3, CD4 and CD19. However, there was a significant difference in the NK (18.3 vs 16.3) cell component. A major advantage in using 3 colour immunophenotyping is the ability to analyse specimens that cannot be analysed using dual colour reagents due to debris or contamination of the gate with non-lymphocytic cells.
