Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Comparison of patient reactions and diagnostic quality for hysterosalpingography using ionic and nonionic contrast
M Y Chen1, R J Zagoria, J A Fayez
1Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1088, USA.
Insights
Nonionic iohexol contrast media resulted in fewer adverse reactions, particularly abdominal pain, compared to ionic contrast media (diatrizoate meglumine combined with iodipamide meglumine) during hysterosalpingography (HSG). Image quality remained excellent for both.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Gynecology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is a key diagnostic procedure in gynecology.
- Contrast media selection impacts patient experience and diagnostic accuracy in HSG.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare adverse reactions and image quality between ionic (DM + IM) and nonionic (iohexol) contrast media in HSG.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different contrast agents for HSG.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 95 patients undergoing HSG.
- Patients received either ionic (diatrizoate meglumine + iodipamide meglumine) or nonionic (iohexol) contrast media.
- Adverse reactions and pain severity were self-reported; image quality was assessed by radiologists.
Main Results:
- Lower prevalence of immediate and 24-hr adverse reactions, including moderate/severe abdominal pain, with iohexol compared to DM + IM.
- Excellent visualization of the uterine cavity and ampullary rugae achieved with both contrast media (87-92%).
Conclusions:
- Both iohexol and DM + IM are effective contrast media for HSG.
- Iohexol may offer a superior safety profile by reducing the incidence and severity of post-procedural abdominal pain.
Rationale And Objectives:
We compared adverse reactions and image quality for hysterosalpingography (HSG) performed with ionic (diatrizoate meglumine combined with iodipamide meglumine [DM + IM]) and nonionic (iohexol) contrast media.
Methods:
We performed a study of 95 patients who had HSG and were randomly selected to receive DM + IM or iohexol. Patients reported episodes of abdominal pain and other adverse reactions immediately and 24 hr after the procedure and categorized severity of symptoms on a subjective scale. Two radiologists evaluated image quality for diagnosis.
Results:
Prevalence of abdominal pain and other reactions both immediately and 24 hr after HSG was lower in patients who received iohexol than in patients who received DM + IM. Moderate or severe abdominal pain was significantly lower in the iohexol group than in the DM + IM group (p < .05). Visualization of the uterine cavity and ampullary rugae was judged excellent with both contrast media (87% with iohexol and 92% with DM + IM).
Conclusion:
Iohexol and DM + IM are excellent contrast media for use during HSG; iohexol 300 may cause fewer episodes of more severe and prolonged abdominal pain.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

