Effects of laparoscopic and conventional (open) cholecystectomy on human leukocyte antigen-DR expression in

F Carlei1, M Schietroma, G Cianca

  • 1Department of Experimental Medicine, University of L'Aquila, Via Vetoio, Coppito 2, Coppito, L'Aquila, Italy.

World Journal of Surgery
|December 5, 1998
PubMed

Insights

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) preserves immune function better than open surgery, reducing postoperative pain and infection risk. This minimally invasive approach avoids immunosuppression by conserving human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) activity.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Surgical Research
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery

Background:

  • Surgery is known to suppress the immune system.
  • Open cholecystectomy is a traditional surgical approach.
  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a minimally invasive alternative.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the impact of LC versus open cholecystectomy on immune responses.
  • To evaluate changes in specific immune markers post-surgery.
  • To assess postoperative morbidity and recovery associated with each surgical method.

Main Methods:

  • Immune activity (neutrophils, lymphocytes, HLA-DR) was measured in 53 patients before and after surgery.
  • 26 patients underwent open cholecystectomy, and 27 underwent LC.
  • Immune parameters were assessed on postoperative days 1, 3, and 6.

Main Results:

  • Open surgery patients showed increased neutrophils and reduced monocyte HLA-DR post-surgery.
  • LC patients exhibited minimal changes in neutrophils and maintained HLA-DR levels.
  • Two cases of respiratory tract infection occurred in the open surgery group.

Conclusions:

  • LC significantly reduces postoperative pain, hospitalization, and infection rates compared to open surgery.
  • LC preserves immune function, particularly HLA-DR activity, mitigating postoperative immunosuppression.
  • Minimally invasive laparoscopic cholecystectomy promotes faster recovery and reduces overall morbidity.

Related Concept Videos