Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

"So you think I'll survive?": a qualitative study about doctor-patient dialogues preceding high-risk cardiac surgery or intervention.

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2009
Same author

"If you cannot tolerate that risk, you should never become a physician": a qualitative study about existential experiences among physicians.

Journal of medical ethics·2008
Same author

[Better health services for lesbian women].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2002
Same author

From exercise and education to movement and interaction. Treatment groups in primary care for women with chronic muscular pain.

Scandinavian journal of primary health care·2002
Same author

[A shared room of reflection where the patient's symptoms are valid sources of knowledge].

Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening : tidsskrift for praktisk medicin, ny raekke·2002
Same author

[Subjective symptoms without objective findings--a challenge for theory and practice of general medicine].

Ugeskrift for laeger·2002
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
13:48

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

Investigación cualitativa: estándares, desafíos y directrices.

K Malterud1

  • 1Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Ulriksdal 8C, N-5009, Bergen, Norway. kirsti.malterud@isf.uib.no

Lancet (London, England)
|August 22, 2001
PubMed
Resumen

Los métodos de investigación cualitativos mejoran la comprensión médica al complementar los enfoques cuantitativos. Los estándares clave como la relevancia, la validez y la reflexividad son cruciales para una investigación cualitativa rigurosa en medicina.

Más Videos Relacionados

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Jun 14, 2026

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility
13:48

Design and Construction of an Urban Runoff Research Facility

Published on: August 8, 2014

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide
04:50

Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research Using Biological Standards: The Example of Platelet Agonist Collagen-Related Peptide

Published on: August 4, 2023

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Metodología de la investigación médica.
  • Investigación cualitativa en el cuidado de la salud.

Sus antecedentes:

  • La investigación cualitativa ofrece valiosos conocimientos sobre la medicina.
  • Tradicionalmente vistos como separados, los métodos cualitativos y cuantitativos son complementarios.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Proponer relevancia, validez y reflexividad como estándares generales para la investigación cualitativa en medicina.
  • Abordar los desafíos en la investigación médica cualitativa, incluida la reflexividad, la transferibilidad y la interpretación.

Principales métodos:

  • Discusión de los principios de la investigación cualitativa. discusión de los principios de la investigación cualitativa.
  • Exploración de los desafíos específicos para los investigadores médicos utilizando métodos cualitativos.
  • Propuesta de directrices para la realización de investigaciones cualitativas en medicina.

Principales resultados:

  • La relevancia, la validez y la reflexividad se identifican como estándares clave para la investigación cualitativa.
  • Se destacan los desafíos específicos en la investigación cualitativa médica.
  • Se proponen directrices para mejorar la investigación cualitativa en medicina.

Conclusiones:

  • Los métodos de investigación cualitativos y cuantitativos se pueden integrar de manera efectiva en la investigación médica.
  • El establecimiento de normas y directrices claras mejora el rigor y la aplicabilidad de la investigación médica cualitativa.