Videos de Experimentos Relacionados
Percepción del autor de la revisión por pares: impacto de la calidad y la aceptación de la revisión en la
Ellen J Weber1, Patricia P Katz, Joseph F Waeckerle
1Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Ave, Box 0208, San Francisco, CA 94143-0208, USA. weber@medicine.ucsf.edu
JAMA
|June 1, 2002
Resumen
La satisfacción del autor con la revisión por pares es modesta y está vinculada a la aceptación del manuscrito, no a la calidad de la revisión. Los autores rechazados informaron insatisfacción con el tiempo de decisión y la comunicación con el editor.
Área de la Ciencia:
- Publicaciones Médicas Ediciones Médicas
- La comunicación académica es la comunicación académica.
Sus antecedentes:
- La percepción de los autores de la revisión por pares es crucial para la sostenibilidad de las revistas.
- Comprender los impulsores de la satisfacción del autor puede mejorar el proceso de revisión por pares.
Objetivo del estudio:
- Para determinar la percepción del autor del proceso de revisión por pares.
- Para evaluar la asociación entre la calidad de la revisión por pares y la satisfacción del autor.
Principales métodos:
- Se distribuyó una encuesta a 897 autores correspondientes de manuscritos enviados a los Anales de Medicina de Emergencia.
- 576 autores (64%) respondieron a la encuesta evaluando la satisfacción en una escala Likert de 5 puntos.
- Se compararon los niveles de satisfacción entre los autores de manuscritos aceptados, revisados y rechazados y rechazados sin revisión.
Principales resultados:
- La satisfacción general del autor fue modesta (puntuación media de 3.1/5), significativamente más alta para los manuscritos aceptados (3.7) que para los rechazados (2.8-3.0).
- Los autores de los manuscritos rechazados informaron insatisfacción con el tiempo de decisión y la comunicación editorial.
- La satisfacción del autor se asoció fuertemente con la aceptación del manuscrito (OR 6.12) pero no con la calificación de calidad de las revisiones (OR 1.26).
Conclusiones:
- La satisfacción del autor con el proceso de revisión por pares es generalmente modesta.
- La aceptación del manuscrito es un factor clave de la satisfacción del autor, superando la calidad de la revisión.
- Mejorar la comunicación y la puntualidad de las decisiones es esencial para aumentar la satisfacción entre los autores de manuscritos rechazados.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
03:00Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
01:29Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
01:27Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
01:30Social Foundations of Self III: Self-Evaluation
Self-evaluation is the process by which individuals assess their abilities, behaviors, and characteristics based on feedback from others. Charles H. Cooley observed that a person’s self-perception is primarily influenced by how others see and judge them. He suggested that individuals form their identities based on their interpretations of others' reactions. As a result, social interactions play a crucial role in shaping self-esteem and personal identity. These external evaluations often blend...
01:23Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Adolescence is a pivotal period of identity formation, during which individuals begin to answer questions central to their sense of self, such as "Who am I?" and "Who do I hope to become?" Both parents and peers play critical roles in guiding adolescents through this complex developmental phase.
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
02:57The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...