Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

07:47
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
Published on: January 9, 2016
Las teorías de la negociación retrasan los retrasos
Resumen
La teoría de juegos revela que las disparidades de información, no solo las reglas de procedimiento, causan costosas demoras en la resolución de disputas como huelgas y reclamos legales.
Área de la Ciencia:
- Estudios de resolución de disputas Estudios de resolución de disputas.
- Aplicaciones de la teoría de juegos.
- Economía del trabajo Economía del trabajo.
Sus antecedentes:
- Las negociaciones contractuales y los acuerdos legales a menudo implican largas demoras.
- Estos retrasos pueden llevar a costos significativos para todas las partes involucradas.
- Comprender las causas de estos retrasos es crucial para una resolución eficiente.
Objetivo del estudio:
- Analizar las causas de los costosos retrasos en la resolución de disputas.
- Explorar el papel de la teoría de juegos en la comprensión de las dinámicas de negociación.
- Investigar el impacto de las disparidades de información en los tiempos de liquidación.
Principales métodos:
- Utilizando formulaciones de la teoría de juegos para modelar la negociación de disputas.
- Desarrollo de varios modelos teóricos para explicar los retrasos en las negociaciones.
- Relacionar las predicciones del modelo con los datos empíricos sobre las huelgas laborales.
Principales resultados:
- Las características de procedimiento en las negociaciones pueden contribuir a los retrasos.
- Las disparidades de información entre las partes negociadoras se identifican como una de las principales causas de retrasos.
- Los modelos muestran una correlación entre la asimetría de la información y la duración de la negociación.
Conclusiones:
- La teoría de juegos proporciona valiosos conocimientos sobre la economía de la resolución de disputas.
- Abordar las disparidades de información puede reducir significativamente los tiempos y costos de negociación.
- Investigaciones adicionales pueden refinar los modelos para predecir y mitigar los retrasos en las negociaciones.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Exchange Theory
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective.
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
