Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Obedience01:08

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

US budget 'freezes' spending on research.

Nature·2018
Same author

Scientists should not resign themselves to Brexit.

Nature·2017
Same author

The elephant in the room we can't ignore.

Nature·2016
Same author

Time to cry out for academic freedom.

Nature·2015
Same author

Rejection of GM crops is not a failure for science.

Nature·2015
Same author

The future of science will soon be upon us.

Nature·2015

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: May 12, 2026

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
09:12

The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

Published on: July 4, 2013

¿Mala conducta científica: más policías, más ladrones?

Colin Macilwain

    Cell
    |June 26, 2012
    PubMed
    Resumen
    Este resumen es generado por máquina.

    La comunidad científica está abordando la mala conducta en la investigación, previamente subestimada. Ampliar la definición puede ofrecer una solución para minimizar y vigilar la integridad científica.

    Más Videos Relacionados

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
    09:49

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

    Published on: December 24, 2015

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

    Last Updated: May 12, 2026

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress
    09:12

    The Resident-intruder Paradigm: A Standardized Test for Aggression, Violence and Social Stress

    Published on: July 4, 2013

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
    09:49

    Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

    Published on: December 24, 2015

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    Área de la Ciencia:

    • La integridad científica.
    • Ética de la Investigación Ética de la Investigación
    • Incumplimiento de conducta académica.

    Sus antecedentes:

    • Históricamente, la mala conducta en la investigación se consideraba demasiado rara para justificar una atención significativa.
    • La comunidad científica ahora está buscando activamente métodos para minimizar y investigar la mala conducta policial.
    • Hay un creciente reconocimiento de la necesidad de sistemas robustos para mantener los estándares científicos.

    Objetivo del estudio:

    • Explorar estrategias para minimizar y vigilar la mala conducta de la investigación dentro de la comunidad científica.
    • Investigar el potencial de ampliar la definición de mala conducta en la investigación como una estrategia clave.
    • Evaluar las implicaciones de redefinir la mala conducta en la investigación para la práctica científica y la supervisión.

    Principales métodos:

    • Este estudio implica un análisis conceptual de las definiciones existentes de mala conducta en la investigación.
    • Examina el impacto potencial de la ampliación de estas definiciones en la detección y la prevención.
    • La investigación considera las implicaciones políticas y las respuestas de la comunidad a los cambios de definición.

    Principales resultados:

    • Ampliar la definición de mala conducta en la investigación podría mejorar su detectabilidad y capacidad de medición.
    • Un alcance más amplio puede alentar medidas más proactivas contra los errores científicos y el fraude.
    • Este enfoque podría fomentar un entorno de investigación más riguroso y responsable.

    Conclusiones:

    • Ampliar la definición de mala conducta en la investigación es una estrategia viable para mejorar la supervisión.
    • La vigilancia proactiva y los esfuerzos de minimización son cruciales para mantener la confianza pública en la ciencia.
    • Una reevaluación de lo que constituye una mala conducta es esencial para el futuro de la integridad científica.