Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Aug 17, 2026
05:02
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Minimizar las tres etapas del sesgo de publicación
T C Chalmers1, C S Frank, D Reitman
1Technology Assessment Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass 02115.
JAMA
|March 9, 1990
Resumen
El sesgo de publicación, que abarca las etapas de prepublicación, publicación y pospublicación, afecta la integridad de la investigación. Minimizar este sesgo requiere investigación de alta calidad, revisión por pares transparente y publicación de todos los resultados de ensayos legítimos.
Área de la Ciencia:
- Integridad de la investigación médica Integridad de la investigación médica
- Ética de la publicación científica Ética de las publicaciones científicas
Sus antecedentes:
- El sesgo de publicación es un problema significativo que afecta la confiabilidad de la evidencia científica.
- Se manifiesta en tres etapas distintas: prepublicación, publicación y pospublicación.
Objetivo del estudio:
- Para delinear las etapas de la publicación. sesgo.
- Proponer estrategias para minimizar el sesgo en la publicación científica.
Principales métodos:
- El estudio define y categoriza el sesgo de publicación en tres etapas.
- En él se describen las posibles causas y consecuencias en cada etapa.
- Se presentan recomendaciones para la mitigación del sesgo.
Principales resultados:
- El sesgo de pre-publicación se deriva de problemas de conducta de la investigación y estándares dobles.
- El sesgo de publicación implica la aceptación del manuscrito basado en los resultados, con revisores sesgados como una preocupación.
- El sesgo posterior a la publicación surge de las interpretaciones y revisiones de los ensayos publicados.
Conclusiones:
- Minimizar el sesgo requiere investigación de alta calidad y revisiones completas de la literatura.
- Eliminar el doble rasero en la investigación y la práctica clínica es crucial.
- La publicación de todos los ensayos legítimos, la revisión por pares transparente y el uso de metanálisis son estrategias clave.
Más Videos Relacionados
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
01:52Regression Toward the Mean
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
01:10Bonferroni Test
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
01:22Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
01:13Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
01:28Methods of Medium Optimization
Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...