Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Predicting Reaction Outcomes02:24

Predicting Reaction Outcomes

9.1K
Kinetics describes the rate and path by which a reaction occurs. In contrast, thermodynamics deals with state functions and describes the properties, behavior, and components of a system. It is not concerned with the path taken by the process and cannot address the rate at which a reaction occurs. Although it does provide information about what can happen during a reaction process, it does not describe the detailed steps of what appears on an atomic or a molecular level. On the other hand,...
9.1K
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN202:27

Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2

13.1K
Nucleophilic substitution reactions of alkyl halides can proceed via an SN1 or an SN2 mechanism. While in SN2 reactions, the nucleophile attacks the substrate simultaneously as the leaving group departs, in SN1 reactions, the substrate first dissociates to give the carbocation intermediate. Various factors such as the structure of the substrate, the strength of the nucleophile, and the nature of the solvent promote one mechanism over the other.
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
13.1K
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination02:52

Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination

11.1K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
11.1K
Crossed Aldol Reactions: Overview01:04

Crossed Aldol Reactions: Overview

5.4K
Crossed aldol addition is the reaction between two different carbonyl compounds under acidic or basic conditions. Here, both the carbonyl compounds function as nucleophiles and electrophiles. As shown in Figure 1, such a reaction yields a mixture of products, two of which are formed via self-condensation, while the remaining two are formed via crossed-condensation. Without adjustment, the reaction's usefulness in organic chemistry is decreased.
5.4K
Classification of Titrimetric Analysis Based on Reaction Types01:01

Classification of Titrimetric Analysis Based on Reaction Types

2.0K
Titrimetric analysis in solution chemistry involves measuring the volume of solutions and is often called volumetric analysis. The standard solution of known concentration in the burette is called the titrant, whereas the solution of unknown concentration in the flask is called the analyte, or titrand. Titrimetric analyses can be classified into four types based on the reactions between the titrant and analyte.
Titrations between an acid and a base lead to neutralization reactions that form...
2.0K
Reaction Mechanisms: Rate-limiting Step Approximation01:29

Reaction Mechanisms: Rate-limiting Step Approximation

100
The rate-determining step, or RDS, in a chemical reaction is the slowest step that determines the overall reaction rate. It is identified by using the observed rate law and typically involves approximation methods like the RDS approximation or the steady-state approximation.In the RDS approximation, also known as the rate-limiting-step or equilibrium approximation, the reaction mechanism consists of one or more reversible reactions near equilibrium, followed by a slower RDS, and then one or...
100

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Autoparty: Machine Learning-Guided Visual Inspection of Molecular Docking Results.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same author

MIC: A deep learning tool for assigning ions and waters in cryo-EM and crystal structures.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

An improved model for prediction of de novo designed proteins with diverse geometries.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Evolutionary-scale enzymology enables exploration of a rugged catalytic landscape.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

ChromaFactor: Deconvolution of single-molecule chromatin organization with non-negative matrix factorization.

PLoS computational biology·2025
Same author

Fuzz Testing Molecular Representation Using Deep Variational Anomaly Generation.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2025
Same journal

A native sulfur deposit in Gale crater, Mars.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Coordinated demise of harmful algal blooms.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Genetic effects put into context.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Bacteria share proteins to survive antibiotics.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Impacts shaped Earth's first continents.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same journal

Erratum for the Report "Covalently bonded single-molecule junctions with stable and reversible photoswitched conductivity" by C. Jia <i>et al</i>.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Ver todos los artículos relacionados

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: May 2, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.0K

Comentario sobre "Predicción del rendimiento de la reacción en el acoplamiento cruzado C-N utilizando el aprendizaje

Kangway V Chuang1, Michael J Keiser2

  • 1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Institute for Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Science (New York, N.Y.)
|November 17, 2018
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

Se evaluaron modelos de aprendizaje automático para predecir el rendimiento de la reacción de acoplamiento cruzado C-N. El estudio encontró que el diseño experimental era insuficiente para validar los modelos, fallando los controles clásicos de aprendizaje automático.

Más Videos Relacionados

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: May 2, 2026

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
04:09

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

8.0K
Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
06:50

Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions

Published on: January 26, 2024

2.8K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Química
  • Aprendizaje automático
  • Ciencia de los datos

Sus antecedentes:

  • Predecir los resultados de las reacciones químicas es crucial para la química sintética.
  • El aprendizaje automático (ML) ofrece potencial para predecir los rendimientos de la reacción.
  • La validación precisa del modelo es esencial para las aplicaciones fiables de ML en química.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Evaluar la eficacia de los modelos ML en la predicción de los rendimientos de la reacción de acoplamiento cruzado C-N.
  • Evaluar la validez de los modelos de ML utilizando descriptores químicos frente a características aleatorias.

Principales métodos:

  • Aplicación de modelos ML que utilizan descriptores atómicos, electrónicos y vibratorios como características de entrada.
  • Se utilizaron escenarios de prueba retrospectivos y prospectivos.
  • Comparación del rendimiento del modelo entrenado con características químicas frente a características de valor aleatorio.

Principales resultados:

  • El diseño experimental no pudo distinguir adecuadamente entre los modelos entrenados en características químicas y los entrenados en características aleatorias.
  • Los modelos ML no pasaron los controles clásicos para su validación.
  • El poder predictivo de los descriptores químicos no se ha establecido definitivamente.

Conclusiones:

  • El diseño experimental actual es inadecuado para validar los modelos de ML para la predicción del rendimiento de la reacción.
  • Es necesario refinar aún más el diseño experimental para evaluar de manera fiable el rendimiento del modelo ML en química.
  • El estudio pone de relieve la importancia de una validación rigurosa en la aplicación de ML a la investigación química.