Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Jul 11, 2025

06:28
E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.4K
La corrección es valiente
1H. Holden Thorp Editor-in-Chief, Science journals.
Resumen
Los recientes errores de investigación de alto perfil erosionan la confianza del público en la ciencia. Mejorar la integridad de la ciencia requiere un ecosistema receptivo que involucre a revistas, instituciones e investigadores que trabajen juntos.
Área de la Ciencia:
- Política científica y tecnológica
- Integridad de la investigación
- La confianza del público en la ciencia
Sus antecedentes:
- El discurso público está cada vez más influenciado por asuntos científicos, incluido el COVID-19.
- Han surgido errores de investigación de alto perfil, que han afectado la confianza del público.
- Temas como la inteligencia artificial, el cambio climático y las pandemias crean incertidumbre, destacando la necesidad de confiar en la ciencia.
Objetivo del estudio:
- Para hacer frente a la erosión de la confianza pública en la ciencia debido a errores de investigación.
- Hacer hincapié en la importancia de la integridad científica en el clima sociopolítico actual.
- Abogar por un ecosistema científico más receptivo.
Principales métodos:
- Análisis del impacto de los errores de investigación en la confianza del público.
- Revisión de las políticas institucionales relativas a la mala conducta científica.
- Discusión sobre el papel de las revistas científicas, las instituciones y los investigadores.
Principales resultados:
- Los errores de investigación, ya sean intencionales o no, socavan significativamente la confianza en los hallazgos científicos.
- Si bien un ecosistema científico completamente libre de errores es poco realista, es posible lograr mejoras.
- La integridad científica se ha convertido en un foco clave para las principales instituciones estadounidenses.
Conclusiones:
- Es necesario un esfuerzo colaborativo e intencional de revistas científicas, instituciones e investigadores para fomentar un ecosistema científico más receptivo.
- El fortalecimiento de la integridad científica es crucial para mantener la confianza pública en medio de las incertidumbres mundiales.
- Las políticas que abordan la mala conducta son importantes, pero la evolución de todo el ecosistema es clave.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
6.4K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.4K
Distance Corrections
31
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
31
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
1.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
1.6K
Punishment
194
Negative reinforcement and punishment are often confused but serve distinct functions in behavior modification. Reinforcement, whether positive or negative, increases the likelihood of a desired behavior, while punishment decreases it.
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior....
194
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
2.0K
Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...
2.0K

