Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.3K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.3K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

5.7K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.7K
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

7.1K
The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
7.1K
Gene Duplication and Divergence02:37

Gene Duplication and Divergence

6.1K
The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was  generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are...
6.1K
Incomplete Dominance01:43

Incomplete Dominance

22.6K
Gregor Mendel's work (1822 - 1884) was primarily focused on pea plants. Through his initial experiments, he determined that every gene in a diploid cell has two variants called alleles inherited from each parent. He suggested that amongst these two alleles, one allele is dominant in character and the other recessive. The combination of alleles determines the phenotype of a gene in an organism.
22.6K
Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift01:09

Mutation, Gene Flow, and Genetic Drift

58.4K
In a population that is not at Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, the frequency of alleles changes over time. Therefore, any deviations from the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium can alter the genetic variation of a given population. Conditions that change the genetic variability of a population include mutations, natural selection, non-random mating, gene flow, and genetic drift (small population size).
58.4K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Equal in death: Ancient genomic analysis of children's early Christian burials.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Genetic diversity of late Neanderthals in northwestern Europe.

Nature·2026
Same author

Regulation of NAT1 activity in modern humans by a novel phosphorylation site.

Science advances·2026
Same author

A high-coverage Neandertal genome from the Altai Mountains reveals population structure among Neandertals.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Ancestral FUT2 genetic adaptation confers resistance to modern norovirus and rotavirus infections.

Current opinion in virology·2026
Same author

Genetic relatedness mattered in the co-burial ritual of Neolithic hunter-gatherers.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2026

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources
15:28

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources

Published on: September 3, 2009

20.2K

Los cambios genéticos que dieron forma a los neandertales, los denisovanos y los humanos modernos

Hugo Zeberg1, Mattias Jakobsson2, Svante Pääbo3

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 17165 Stockholm, Sweden.

Cell
|February 17, 2024
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

Los humanos modernos sobrevivieron y prosperaron sobre los neandertales y los denisovanos debido a una combinación de características genéticas, no una sola diferencia definidora. Comprender estas antiguas variaciones genéticas humanas es clave.

Más Videos Relacionados

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
06:18

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains

Published on: November 30, 2021

3.8K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

964

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources
15:28

Primer Extension Capture: Targeted Sequence Retrieval from Heavily Degraded DNA Sources

Published on: September 3, 2009

20.2K
Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains
06:18

Optimized Bone Sampling Protocols for the Retrieval of Ancient DNA from Archaeological Remains

Published on: November 30, 2021

3.8K
Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

964

Área de la Ciencia:

  • La paleogenética
  • La evolución del hombre
  • Genética de las poblaciones

Sus antecedentes:

  • Los humanos modernos, los neandertales y los denisovanos divergieron de un ancestro común hace aproximadamente 600.000 años.
  • Estos grupos de homínidos coexistieron y se cruzaron hasta hace unos 40.000 años.
  • Una cuestión evolutiva significativa es la razón de la supervivencia y la complejidad cultural de los humanos modernos en comparación con otros homínidos.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Explorar las diferencias genéticas entre los humanos modernos, los neandertales y los denisovanos.
  • Investigar las implicaciones funcionales de estas diferencias genéticas.
  • Proponer una comprensión matizada de los fundamentos genéticos de la identidad humana moderna.

Principales métodos:

  • Análisis genómico comparativo de secuencias de ADN humano antiguo y moderno.
  • Análisis funcional de las variaciones genéticas identificadas.
  • Revisión de la literatura sobre la genética de la población de homínidos y la historia evolutiva.

Principales resultados:

  • El intercambio genético ocurrió entre los humanos modernos, los neandertales y los denisovanos.
  • Anticipación de que los futuros datos genómicos revelarán diferencias genéticas mínimas que distinguen a todos los humanos modernos de todos los neandertales y denisovanos.
  • Identificación de las variaciones genéticas específicas y sus posibles consecuencias funcionales.

Conclusiones:

  • La supervivencia y el éxito de los humanos modernos probablemente se derivan de una combinación de rasgos genéticos en lugar de una sola característica definidora.
  • La definición genética de un "humano moderno" es probablemente un mosaico de rasgos, sin un solo rasgo presente en cada individuo.
  • La investigación genómica en curso continúa refinando nuestra comprensión de la historia evolutiva humana y la diversidad de la población.