Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

279
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
279
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level01:16

Critical Region, Critical Values and Significance Level

12.2K
The critical region, critical value, and significance level are interdependent concepts crucial in hypothesis testing.
In hypothesis testing, a sample statistic is converted to a test statistic using z, t, or chi-square distribution. A critical region is an area under the curve in  probability distributions demarcated by the critical value. When the test statistic falls in this region, it suggests that the null hypothesis must be rejected. As this region contains all those values of the...
12.2K
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

2.0K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
2.0K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

6.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.4K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Hyaluronic acid targeted and pH-responsive nanocarriers based on hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for chemo-photodynamic combination therapy.

Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces·2020
Same author

Tumor phase recognition using cone-beam computed tomography projections and external surrogate information.

Medical physics·2020
Same author

Realization of a time-correlated photon counting technique for fluorescence analysis.

Biomedical optics express·2020
Same author

Ultrasonographic Diagnosis of Lipomatosis of Nerve: A Review of Ultrasonographic Finding for 8 Cases.

World neurosurgery·2020
Same author

Is dietary fat associated with the risk of age-related macular degeneration? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Medicine·2020
Same author

Comparing the Prevalence of Poor Sleep and Stress Metrics in Basic versus Advanced Life Support Emergency Medical Services Personnel.

Prehospital emergency care·2020
Same journal

Validation of the Effectiveness of Visual Feedback Systems in Respiratory Gating Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Emerging Outcome Trends From Proton Therapy for Pediatric CNS Tumors: A Systematic Review.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Biologically Effective Dose-Optimized Multi-Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy: A Biologically Comparable Alternative to Proton Arc Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Review.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Characterization of a Low-Energy Cyclotron-Based Proton Beam for Preclinical Radiobiological Studies.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Same journal

Phenomenological Study of Intra-Spill Break Spots in Dose-Driven Continuous Scanning Proton Therapy.

International journal of particle therapy·2026
Ver todos los artículos relacionados

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K

Métodos de evaluación de la robustez en el peor de los casos para el IMPT: una comparación crítica

Chunbo Liu1,2, Chris J Beltran2, Jiajian Shen3

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.

International journal of particle therapy
|August 20, 2025
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

La evaluación de la robustez de la terapia de protones modulada por intensidad (IMPT, por sus siglas en inglés) es crucial para la administración segura de dosis. Este estudio comparó métodos, recomendando un enfoque combinado utilizando bandas de DVH y análisis del peor caso en términos de voxel para una evaluación eficaz del plan clínico de IMPT.

Palabras clave:
Terapia de protones modulada por la intensidadEvaluación de la solidezEnfoque del peor caso

Más Videos Relacionados

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

565
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Sep 8, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

565
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
07:28

Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity

Published on: January 21, 2017

7.1K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Física médica
  • Radiología Oncológica
  • Planificación de la radioterapia

Sus antecedentes:

  • La evaluación de la robustez es esencial para garantizar la administración precisa de la dosis en la práctica clínica de la terapia de protones modulada por intensidad (IMPT, por sus siglas en inglés).
  • A pesar de su importancia, no existe consenso sobre el método óptimo para la evaluación de la solidez del plan IMPT.
  • Este estudio investiga varios métodos dentro del enfoque del peor caso para informar la toma de decisiones clínicas.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Comparar la eficacia de diferentes métodos de evaluación de la robustez para los planes de terapia de protones modulada por intensidad (IMPT, por sus siglas en inglés).
  • Proporcionar información sobre la selección de una estrategia de evaluación del plan de IMPT práctica y clínicamente aplicable.
  • Identificar las correlaciones y las capacidades de varias técnicas de evaluación de la robustez.

Principales métodos:

  • Se evaluaron cinco métodos de evaluación de la robustez en 20 planes clínicos de IMPT (10 de próstata, 10 de cabeza y cuello).
  • Los métodos incluidos: distribución de la dosis por la barra de error (ebDD), distribución de la dosis por la raíz media del error cuadrado (RMSED), el peor caso en términos de voxel, el peor caso de escenario físico y la banda del histograma de dosis-volumen (DVH).
  • Se analizaron las correlaciones entre los métodos y se evaluó su capacidad cuantitativa y cualitativa para detectar errores de dosis.

Principales resultados:

  • Se observaron fuertes correlaciones entre el ebDD y el RMSED, y entre el peor escenario voxel y el peor escenario físico.
  • La banda DVH ofrece una visión clara de las variaciones de dosis con respecto a los criterios, pero carece de localización espacial.
  • El peor caso de Voxel es excelente para identificar áreas específicas de preocupación dentro de la distribución de la dosis.
  • El peor escenario físico identifica áreas problemáticas, pero puede ser engorroso para múltiples regiones/métricas.

Conclusiones:

  • Los diferentes métodos de evaluación de la robustez proporcionan información distinta y valiosa para la evaluación del plan IMPT.
  • Se propone una estrategia combinada: utilizar las bandas DVH de los escenarios de incertidumbre física para el control de los criterios.
  • Utilice el análisis del peor caso en términos de voxel para localizar espacialmente los riesgos cuando las bandas DVH indican problemas potenciales.