Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

822
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
822
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
What are Estimates?01:06

What are Estimates?

5.4K
It isn't easy to measure a parameter such as the mean height or the mean weight of a population. So, we draw samples from the population and calculate the mean height or mean weight of the individuals in the sample. This sample data acts as a representative measure of the population parameter. These sample statistics are known as estimates. 
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
5.4K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.0K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.0K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

635
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
635
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

208
Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
208

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Different Clinical Questions Need Different Estimands.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2026
Same author

A multi-site laboratory evaluation of the MEDSCAN application for automated POC-CCA interpretation.

Frontiers in parasitology·2026
Same author

Phase 3 PERSPECTIVE study: Ibrutinib with rituximab for initial treatment of patients with follicular lymphoma.

HemaSphere·2026
Same author

CD8 T lymphocytes deploy embryonic cell cycle control mechanisms for rapid cell proliferation.

EMBO reports·2026
Same author

Staff Perspectives on Non-Routine Compression Therapy for Inpatients With Venous Leg Ulcers: A Qualitative Study.

International wound journal·2026
Same author

Defining disease stability in COPD: Evidence from Phase 3 clinical trials.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine·2026

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K

El marco de estimación y la inferencia causal: paradigmas complementarios que no compiten

Thomas Drury1, Jonathan W Bartlett2, David Wright3

  • 1GSK, London, UK.

Pharmaceutical statistics
|August 23, 2025
PubMed
Resumen

El marco de estimación ICH E9 (R1) y la inferencia causal ofrecen enfoques complementarios para definir los efectos del tratamiento en ensayos clínicos. La comprensión de ambos mejora el diseño del ensayo, el análisis y la claridad de la interpretación.

Más Videos Relacionados

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.6K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.3K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Estadísticas biológicas
  • Diseño del ensayo clínico
  • Epidemiología

Sus antecedentes:

  • La directriz E9 (R1) del Consejo Internacional de Armonización introdujo un marco de estimación para la especificación precisa del efecto del tratamiento en ensayos clínicos.
  • La relación entre el marco de estimaciones de ICH E9 (R1) y la inferencia causal sigue sin estar clara, a pesar de que ambos definen las estimaciones.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Para comparar y contrastar el marco de estimaciones de ICH E9 (R1) con la inferencia causal.
  • Para ilustrar cómo ambos marcos pueden definir los efectos del tratamiento basados en la población.
  • Resaltar la naturaleza complementaria de estos dos paradigmas en la metodología de los ensayos clínicos.

Principales métodos:

  • Se utilizaron ejemplos ilustrativos para comparar el marco de estimación de ICH E9 (R1) y la inferencia causal.
  • Se analizaron las similitudes y diferencias en la definición de los estimados.
  • Se discutió la accesibilidad y la precisión matemática de cada marco.

Principales resultados:

  • Tanto el ICH E9 (R1) como la inferencia causal pueden definir los efectos del tratamiento basados en la población.
  • El marco ICH E9 (R1) proporciona un enfoque estructurado y accesible para la comunicación.
  • La inferencia causal ofrece precisión matemática y articulación de suposiciones explícitas a través de herramientas como los gráficos causales.

Conclusiones:

  • El marco de estimación ICH E9 (R1) y la inferencia causal son complementarios y no competidores.
  • La integración de ambos enfoques mejora la claridad y la solidez de la comunicación de los ensayos clínicos.
  • La apreciación de los conceptos de ambos marcos fortalece el diseño, el análisis y la interpretación de los ensayos clínicos.