Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Sep 10, 2025
14:43
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
12.0K
Evaluación de la inclusión y la diversidad en la investigación para corregir la información errónea sobre la salud:
Romy Rw1, Junhan Chen2, Yuan Wang3
1Department of Communication Studies, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Health information and libraries journal
|August 26, 2025
Resumen
La investigación de corrección de información errónea sobre la salud a menudo excluye a las poblaciones marginadas. Este estudio encontró una brecha significativa en la inclusión de diversas muestras y características de mensajes, lo que pone de relieve la necesidad de prácticas de investigación más equitativas.
Área de la Ciencia:
- Salud pública
- Comunicación sobre la salud
- Investigación de equidad en salud
Sus antecedentes:
- Los resultados equitativos en salud y el tratamiento de las disparidades sistémicas requieren incluir a las poblaciones marginadas en la investigación de información de salud.
- La subrepresentación de estos grupos es un problema importante, especialmente en el marco de la investigación sobre la corrección de la información errónea sobre la salud.
Objetivo del estudio:
- Evaluar la inclusión y la diversidad de las poblaciones marginadas en los estudios de corrección de la información errónea sobre la salud.
- Características de la muestra evaluada, características del mensaje de corrección y características del estudio para su representación.
Principales métodos:
- Realizó una revisión del alcance de los estudios empíricos.
- Se han identificado 192 estudios empíricos de 158 publicaciones que cumplen los criterios de inclusión.
Principales resultados:
- La literatura sobre la corrección de la información errónea sobre la salud no ha incorporado adecuadamente la inclusión y la diversidad de las poblaciones marginadas.
- Esta subrepresentación es evidente en las características de la muestra y en las características del mensaje de corrección.
Conclusiones:
- Existe una necesidad crítica de dar prioridad a la inclusión y la diversidad en la investigación para corregir la información errónea sobre la salud.
- Abordar esta brecha es esencial para un proceso científico más equitativo e inclusivo.
- Es primordial garantizar que se tengan en cuenta y se incluyan las diversas perspectivas.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
01:29Bias in Epidemiological Studies
675
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
675
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
2.3K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
2.3K
01:22Bias
4.9K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
4.9K
02:16Stereotype Content Model
14.9K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.9K
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
155
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
155
01:56Ethics in Research
24.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
24.0K