Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.0K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.0K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

1.9K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
1.9K
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

3.4K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
3.4K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

2.5K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
2.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

282
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
282
Bonferroni Test01:10

Bonferroni Test

2.8K
The Bonferroni test is a statistical test named after Carlo Emilio Bonferroni, an Italian mathematician best known for Bonferroni inequalities. This statistical test is a type of multiple comparison test to determine which means are different than the rest. Bonferroni test can minimize the Type 1 error by reducing the significance level alpha, which otherwise increases with sample pairs.
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
2.8K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Examining the Potential Benefits of Affirming Values on Memory for Educational Information.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Are you sure? Examining the potential benefits of truth-checking as a learning activity.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2023
Same author

Remembering what to do when the time comes: The effects of offloading in a complex prospective memory task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2022
Same author

Relearning can eliminate the effect of retrieval-induced forgetting.

Psychological research·2021
Same author

A little can go a long way: giving learners some context can enhance the benefits of pretesting.

Memory (Hove, England)·2021
Same author

Pretesting can be beneficial even when using the internet to answer questions.

Memory (Hove, England)·2021
Same journal

An Eye-Tracking Study on Text Accessibility and Comprehension in University Students.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

The Relationship Between Physical Activity, Social Support, and Life Satisfaction Among Female College Students: A Variable- and Person-Centered Analysis.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Shifting the Blame: How Narrative Framing, Coercive Strategies, and Rape Myth Acceptance Distort Perceptions of Sexual Assault and Fuel Victim Blame.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

An AI Perspective on Counseling Supervision.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Symbolic Participation or Substantial Learning Behavior? A PSM-Based Comparison Between Honors and Non-Honors Undergraduates from Two Top Elite Universities in China.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Literacy Profiles in Twice-Exceptional Preadolescents with Intellectual Giftedness and Dyslexia.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Ver todos los artículos relacionados

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

471

Lo siento, ¿Estoy entronizando? Comparación del rendimiento y las tasas de intrusión de la información pre- y

Kelsey K James1, Benjamin C Storm2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Houston Clear Lake, Houston, TX 77058, USA.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)
|August 28, 2025
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

Las pruebas previas y posteriores ayudan al aprendizaje, pero las pruebas previas reducen las intrusiones de información falsa de manera más efectiva que las pruebas posteriores. Incluso con la retroalimentación, las pruebas posteriores llevaron a que se recordara más información falsa.

Palabras clave:
Los erroresAprendizajePruebas previaspruebasel efecto de la sugestión negativael efecto de las pruebas previasel efecto del ensayoprueba verdadero/falso

Más Videos Relacionados

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

56.6K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Sep 10, 2025

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

471
Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

56.6K
Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Psicología educativa
  • Ciencias cognitivas
  • Ciencias del aprendizaje

Sus antecedentes:

  • Las pruebas previas y posteriores son herramientas comunes en el aula para evaluar y mejorar el aprendizaje.
  • La investigación existente sobre los beneficios comparativos de las pruebas previas frente a las posteriores no es concluyente.
  • Las pruebas verdadero/falso se utilizan con frecuencia, pero su impacto en el aprendizaje, en particular el recuerdo de información falsa, no se comprende bien.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Investigar los efectos de las pruebas previas y posteriores de verdadero/falso en el aprendizaje de la información correcta.
  • Examinar cómo las pruebas previas y posteriores influyen en las tasas de intrusión de información falsa.
  • Comparar la eficacia de las pruebas previas y posteriores para reducir al mínimo el recuerdo de información falsa.

Principales métodos:

  • Se realizaron tres experimentos utilizando pruebas verdadero/falso para evaluar los resultados del aprendizaje.
  • Los participantes completaron las pruebas previas y posteriores para evaluar la adquisición de conocimientos y la recuperación de la memoria.
  • Las tasas de intrusión de información falsa se midieron junto con el recuerdo de información correcta.

Principales resultados:

  • Tanto las pruebas previas como las posteriores demostraron beneficios consistentes para el aprendizaje de información correcta.
  • Las tasas de intrusión de información falsa después de la prueba fueron significativamente más altas que antes de la prueba.
  • Si bien la retroalimentación sustancial redujo las intrusiones generales de información falsa, la diferencia entre las tasas de intrusión antes y después de la prueba siguió siendo significativa.

Conclusiones:

  • Las pruebas previas parecen más eficaces que las posteriores para evitar el recuerdo de información falsa.
  • Si bien los mecanismos de retroalimentación pueden mitigar el recuerdo de información falsa, las pruebas previas ofrecen una clara ventaja para reducir las intrusiones.
  • Las estrategias educativas deben considerar el impacto diferencial de las pruebas previas y posteriores en el recuerdo preciso versus inexacto.