Validación externa de los criterios revisados de la tríada letal para la toma de decisiones estratégicas adecuadas

Keisuke Suzuki1, Akira Endo, Tomohiro Akutsu

  • 1From the Department of Acute Critical Care Medicine (K.S., A.E., T.A., H.H.), Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura; Trauma and Acute Critical Care Medical Center (K.S., A.E., T.A., H.H., A.S., W.T., K. Morishita), Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku; Advanced Medical Emergency Department and Critical Care Center (T.O.), Saiseikai Utsunomiya Hospital, Utsunomiya; Emergency and Trauma Center (A.S.), Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa; Division of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (S.K., M.F.), Tohoku University, Sendai; Department of Surgery (Tasuku M.), Kenwakai Otemachi Hospital, Kitakyushu; Department of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (N.H.), Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, Yokohama; Department of Critical Care Medicine and Trauma (K.I), National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tachikawa; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (T.H.), St. Luke's International Hospital, Chuo-ku; Advanced Critical Care Center (Takahito M.), Gifu University Hospital, Gifu; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (A.M.), Saga University Hospital, Saga; Department of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine (H.N.), Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama; Trauma and Critical Care Center (T.S.), Japanese Red Cross Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (K. Miyazaki), Nara Medical University Hospital, Kashihara; Department of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine (N.U.), Japanese Red Cross Maebashi Hospital, Maebashi; Department of Traumatology and Critical Care Medicine (Y.S.), Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, Osaka; Emergency Medical Center (K. Kirizume), Kagawa Medical University, Kita-gun; Department of Emergency Medicine (A.I.), Japan Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (Y.Y.), Hachinohe City Hospital, Hachinohe; Division of Acute and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (T.W.), Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo; Emergency Department (K. Kato), Obihiro Kosei Hospital, Obihiro; Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (K.S.), Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu; Emergency and Critical Care Medicine (M.H.), Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama; and Emergency and Critical Care Center (T.K.), Mie University Hospital, Tsu, Japan.

Resumen

Los criterios de la tríada letal revisados mejoran la predicción de la mortalidad a los 28 días en pacientes con trauma severo. Estos criterios actualizados ofrecen una mayor sensibilidad y especificidad que los métodos convencionales para guiar estrategias terapéuticas críticas.

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.1K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.7K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
223
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.9K
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
96
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory01:20

Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory

Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
501