Simulaciones calibradas empíricamente revelan los límites de los algoritmos de agrupamiento fenotípico para la...

Clustering algorithms are widely used for phenotypic characterization and germplasm management, particularly in data-scarce crops such as neglected and underutilized species (NUS) that lack genomic resources. However, their performance under biologically realistic conditions remains poorly understood. Standard clustering methods commonly applied in crop research often assume distinct, isotropic, and homogeneous clusters, assumptions rarely satisfied in real-world phenotypic datasets. We developed a flexible and empirically calibrated simulation framework, using phenotypic data from West African fonio (Digitaria exilis), to benchmark the performance of eleven clustering algorithms under both idealized and realistic scenarios. Our simulations integrated heterogeneous trait distributions (normal, gamma), strong inter-trait correlations (up to r = -0.84), heteroscedasticity, and moderate population structure (mean Pst = 0.16 ± 0.001, achieved through iterative calibration). Each scenario was replicated 100 times, with clustering accuracy evaluated using external (ARI, NMI) and internal (Silhouette, Davies-Bouldin) validation metrics under standardized conditions. The results revealed consistently poor algorithm performance under realistic conditions (e.g., ARI < 0.07), including for widely used methods in Neglected and Underutilized Species (NUS) research such as K-means, GMM, and PAM. Notably, conventional validation metrics failed to detect biologically meaningful structure revealed by geometric diagnostics, highlighting a critical methodological limitation. Performance markedly improved under idealized conditions, validating our simulation framework. These findings highlight the risk of overinterpreting clustering outputs from weakly structured phenotypic datasets and expose key limitations in current biodiversity analysis practices, particularly those guiding plant genetic resource conservation programs. We provide an open-source R-based diagnostic tool, with parameter specifications to assist practitioners in selecting reproducible and interpretable clustering approaches for germplasm management and biodiversity assessment in data-scarce crops.