Mejora de la educación del paciente en la cirugía de cataratas mediante un chatbot de inteligencia artificial...

To evaluate the effectiveness and usability of a safety-first, clinician-validated conversational AI chatbot for cataract surgery education compared with standard brochures.

University Hospital (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.

Prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Adults scheduled for cataract operation were randomized to receive either standard information brochures alone (control group) or brochures plus access to a hospital-specific chatbot ("Mina"). Primary outcomes were knowledge gain, change in pre- to post-information anxiety, and satisfaction. Those outcomes were measured with questionnaires. Secondary outcomes included chatbot usability (measured with the System Usability Scale, SUS) and engagement with the chatbot.

Sixty-four patients were randomized (chatbot group 33, control group 31). Postoperative questionnaires were completed by 35 patients (14/33 chatbot, 21/31 control). No significant differences were detected in knowledge gain, anxiety change, or satisfaction (p>0.05). Knowledge increased in both groups after receiving information (p<0.001). In the chatbot group, 17/33 (52%) did not engage with the chatbot. Participants engaging with the chatbot tended to be younger (mean age: 64.1 ± 10.9 years) than those who did not (mean age: 74.1± 10.5 years). Among users, 63% of submitted questions matched validated answers. The SUS mean score indicated high usability (83.1±12.1).

A custom-built chatbot with only clinician-validated responses showed high usability but did not improve knowledge, reduce anxiety, or increase satisfaction compared with brochures. Chatbot engagement barriers, particularly among older adults, and limits of validated-only content indicate the need for a hybrid approach of those models, to balance safety and flexibility in digital patient education.