Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Jan 8, 2026
06:05
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
1.6K
Guía de informes basada en el consenso para la evaluación de procesos de estudios de intervención de salud pública
Femke van Nassau1, Bart Cillekens2, Judith G M Jelsma2
1Department of Public and Occupational Health and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, the Netherlands f.vannassau@amsterdamumc.nl.
BMJ open
|December 19, 2025
Resumen
Se desarrolló una nueva guía, CONPHES, para estandarizar la presentación de informes de las evaluaciones de procesos de intervenciones de salud pública. Esto tiene como objetivo mejorar la interpretación de la investigación y la práctica de la salud pública.
Área de la Ciencia:
- Salud Pública
- Investigación en Servicios de Salud
- Ciencia de la Implementación
Sus antecedentes:
- Las evaluaciones de procesos son cruciales para comprender la efectividad de las intervenciones de salud pública.
- La falta de directrices de presentación de informes estandarizadas dificulta la interpretación y comparación de las evaluaciones de procesos.
- Las directrices existentes no abordan adecuadamente las evaluaciones de procesos realizadas junto con ensayos de efectividad.
Objetivo del estudio:
- Desarrollar una guía de presentación de informes basada en el consenso y dirigida por expertos para las evaluaciones de procesos de intervenciones de salud pública.
- Mejorar la calidad y la coherencia de la presentación de informes de las evaluaciones de procesos.
- Facilitar la traducción de los hallazgos de la investigación a la práctica de la salud pública.
Principales métodos:
- Se llevó a cabo un estudio e-Delphi internacional con 137 expertos invitados.
- Los expertos incluyeron a aquellos involucrados en el diseño de la evaluación de procesos, investigadores de alto perfil, editores de revistas y autores de directrices.
- Se alcanzó un consenso (≥67%) sobre 19 ítems de presentación de informes a través de múltiples rondas de retroalimentación de expertos.
Principales resultados:
- La guía CONPHES (Consensus-based Process Evaluation Reporting Guideline for public health Intervention Studies) comprende 19 ítems.
- Los ítems cubren detalles de la intervención, estrategias de implementación, vías causales, equipos de entrega, marcos de evaluación y garantía de calidad.
- Un documento explicativo y de elaboración adjunto proporciona orientación detallada para cada ítem.
Conclusiones:
- Se espera que la guía CONPHES mejore la presentación de informes de las evaluaciones de procesos para las intervenciones de salud pública.
- La mejora de la presentación de informes puede facilitar una mejor comprensión y aplicación de los hallazgos de la investigación.
- Esto contribuye a una práctica de salud pública más efectiva y a mejores resultados de salud.
Más Videos Relacionados
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
8.7K
10:39Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
990
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
380
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
380
01:20Study Designs in Epidemiology
848
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
848
01:16Clinical Trials
10.1K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.1K
01:12Hazard Ratio
549
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
For example, in a clinical trial...
549
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
3.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.6K
01:11Clinical Trials: Overview
4.5K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.5K