Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

1.4K
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.6K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.6K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.4K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.4K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.4K
Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation01:28

Atomic Nuclei: Types of Nuclear Relaxation

870
Nuclear relaxation restores the equilibrium population imbalance and can occur via spin–lattice or spin–spin mechanisms, which are first-order exponential decay processes.
In spin–lattice or longitudinal relaxation, the excited spins exchange energy with the surrounding lattice as they return to the lower energy level. Among several mechanisms that contribute to spin–lattice relaxation, magnetic dipolar interactions are significant. Here, the excited nucleus transfers...
870
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction01:14

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

1.0K
When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
1.0K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Stochastic Cluster Expansion for Spin-Flip Excitations.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Many-Body Perturbation Theory for Driven Dissipative Quasiparticle Flows and Fluctuations.

Physical review letters·2026
Same author

A Stochastic Cluster Expansion for Electronic Correlation in Large Systems.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Altermagnetism Induced Surface Chern Insulator.

Nano letters·2026
Same author

Differentiating urethane and urea bond activation in polyurethane foam acidolysis.

Chemical science·2025
Same author

The Butterfly Structure of Leucomethylene Blue Results in Weak Binding to Single- or Double-Stranded DNA.

The journal of physical chemistry. B·2025

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Jan 8, 2026

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale
08:09

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale

Published on: April 19, 2021

6.0K

Formalismo estocástico para GW rápido resuelto por espín

Xuance Jiang1,2, Vojtech Vlcek1,2

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.

Journal of chemical theory and computation
|December 22, 2025
PubMed
Resumen

Extendimos el método estocástico GW (sGW) para incluir sistemas con polarización de espín. Este avance permite cálculos precisos en materiales magnéticos, mejorando las predicciones computacionales.

Más Videos Relacionados

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

11.0K
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.9K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Jan 8, 2026

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale
08:09

15N CPMG Relaxation Dispersion for the Investigation of Protein Conformational Dynamics on the µs-ms Timescale

Published on: April 19, 2021

6.0K
Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels
11:19

Site Directed Spin Labeling and EPR Spectroscopic Studies of Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channels

Published on: July 4, 2016

11.0K
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.9K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Física de la Materia Condensada
  • Ciencia de Materiales Computacional
  • Química Cuántica

Sus antecedentes:

  • El formalismo estocástico GW (sGW) es una herramienta poderosa para cálculos de estructura electrónica.
  • Los métodos sGW anteriores se limitaban a sistemas no polarizados en espín.
  • La modelización precisa de materiales magnéticos requiere el manejo de estados electrónicos polarizados en espín.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Extender el formalismo sGW a sistemas totalmente polarizados en espín, incluyendo configuraciones de espín colineales y no colineales.
  • Desarrollar un marco computacional para predicciones precisas de muchos cuerpos en materiales magnéticos.

Principales métodos:

  • Desarrollo de una base estocástica de valor complejo para sistemas de espín no colineales.
  • Evaluación imparcial de la interacción apantallada de la aproximación de campo aleatorio (RPA) para espinores.
  • Análisis de errores y pruebas en sistemas de materiales reales.

Principales resultados:

  • El método sGW colineal mantiene la misma complejidad temporal que el sGW no polarizado en espín.
  • El sGW no colineal es computacionalmente 2-3 veces más costoso que el sGW no polarizado en espín, pero escala linealmente con baja multiplicidad.
  • Se establece un marco unificado y escalable para sistemas con polarización de espín, tanto colineales como no colineales.

Conclusiones:

  • El formalismo sGW extendido permite predicciones rutinarias de muchos cuerpos para materiales a gran escala con polarización de espín y acoplamiento espín-órbita.
  • Este trabajo avanza significativamente la capacidad de la ciencia de materiales computacional para aplicaciones espintrónicas.