Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Bias01:22

Bias

7.2K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
7.2K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

6.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
6.1K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.2K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.2K
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

5.5K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
5.5K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

545
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
545
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Episodic memory trajectories of older adults with and without HIV: A longitudinal population-based study in rural South Africa.

PLOS global public health·2026
Same author

How should covariates be handled in randomized trials? Empirical evidence from 50 trials and recommendations for practice.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Doubly Robust Estimators of the Restricted Mean Time in Favor Estimands in Individual- and Cluster-Randomized Trials.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

Test-Negative Designs With Multiple Testing Sources.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same author

EFFICIENT AND MULTIPLY ROBUST RISK ESTIMATION UNDER GENERAL FORMS OF DATASET SHIFT.

Annals of statistics·2026
Same author

Unpacking sources of transmission in HIV prevention trials with deep-sequence pathogen data.

Nature communications·2026

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.8K

Diseños de prueba negativa con diversas razones para la prueba: sesgo estadístico y solución

Mengxin Yu1, Tom Hongyi Liu2, Kendrick Qijun Li3

  • 1The Statistics and Data Science Department of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|December 31, 2025
PubMed
Resumen

Los diseños modificados de prueba negativa para la efectividad de la vacuna pueden tener sesgos. Este estudio presenta un estimador estratificado para tener en cuenta diversas razones de prueba, mejorando la precisión y reduciendo el sesgo en la evaluación de vacunas post-comercialización.

Palabras clave:
COVID-19precisiónestratificaciónefectividad de la vacuna

Más Videos Relacionados

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.7K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Jan 7, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
08:25

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults

Published on: October 19, 2014

15.8K
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.7K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.3K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Epidemiología
  • Bioestadística
  • Vacunología

Sus antecedentes:

  • Los diseños de prueba negativa son cruciales para la evaluación de la efectividad de la vacuna post-comercialización cuando los ensayos aleatorios no son factibles.
  • Las adaptaciones recientes incluyen individuos con diversas razones para la prueba, lo que podría introducir sesgos.
  • Se necesita un examen estadístico formal para estos diseños modificados.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Examinar estadísticamente el posible sesgo en los diseños modificados de prueba negativa.
  • Desarrollar métodos para la estimación no sesgada de la efectividad de la vacuna.
  • Mejorar la precisión incorporando múltiples razones para la prueba.

Principales métodos:

  • Se utilizaron derivaciones estadísticas y gráficos causales para analizar el sesgo.
  • Las razones para la prueba se categorizaron en síntomas, cribado obligatorio y rastreo de contactos.
  • Se empleó la estratificación para una estimación consistente y la eliminación de sesgos.
  • Se propuso y evaluó un nuevo estimador estratificado.

Principales resultados:

  • El estimador estándar de la razón de probabilidades puede tener sesgos si no se consideran diversas razones de prueba.
  • La estratificación elimina eficazmente el sesgo y permite una estimación consistente de la efectividad de la vacuna.
  • El estimador estratificado propuesto puede mejorar la precisión al incorporar múltiples razones de prueba.

Conclusiones:

  • Los diseños modificados de prueba negativa requieren una cuidadosa consideración estadística de las razones de prueba.
  • El método de estratificación propuesto proporciona un enfoque sólido para la estimación de la efectividad de la vacuna.
  • Este trabajo mejora la confiabilidad de la vigilancia post-comercialización de la seguridad y efectividad de las vacunas.