Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Jan 13, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Un marco de aprendizaje automático basado en grafos para la gestión de la calidad del agua de los ríos en condiciones
Sueryun Choi1, Zahid Ullah2, Moon Son2
1Gyeonggi-do Institute of Health and Environment Research, Cheongsa-ro 1beon-gil, Uijeongbu-si, Gyeonggi-do, 11780, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Accurate prediction of riverine water quality is often hindered by sparse sampling and limited streamflow data, a common outcome of resource-constrained watershed monitoring. To address this, we propose a three-module machine-learning framework-prediction (graph neural networks or recurrent networks), interpretation (explainable AI), and management (counterfactual analysis)-and apply it to chromaticity prediction in the Hantan River Basin, Republic of Korea. The dataset includes 1667 monthly observations from 59 monitoring sites (December 2021-October 2024) covering 37 hydro-environmental variables. Performance was assessed using independent training, validation, and test sets. Graph-based models outperformed the recurrent baseline, with the enhanced Graph Sample-and-Aggregate model achieving a test R2 of 0.82, demonstrating that representing pollution-source characteristics and transport pathways improves prediction. Interpretability analyses revealed management-relevant insights: PGExplainer highlighted strong upstream influences from the SC sub-watershed, identifying it as the primary intervention region. Feature attribution distinguished long-term influences (e.g., TOC near major WWTPs) from short-term episodic drivers associated with facility-specific effluent spikes. Counterfactual analyses quantified the reductions in effluent chromaticity and proximal indicators required to achieve downstream targets at site HT Y4. Counterfactual success rates-defined as the proportion of model-generated cases meeting the target-were 26 % and 40 % for chromaticity targets of 14 and 15 color units (CU), respectively. Given these outcomes and considering that 14-15 CU is generally acceptable for basin-scale management, a downstream target of 14-15 CU was proposed as feasible and practical. Overall, the framework serves as a cost-effective and interpretable decision-support tool for watershed management under data-limited monitoring conditions.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Quality of Water
Testing Water Quality
Typical Model Studies
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Manipulation and Analysis

