Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Jan 15, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Espontaneidad vs. supresión: Impactos diferenciales de los tipos de plataforma en el comportamiento de cocreación de

Chengyi Le¹, Zixin Wang², Jingya Wang³

¹Merchants' Guild Economics and Cultural Intelligent Computing Laboratory, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; Business School, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China; School of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, China.

Acta psychologica

|January 13, 2026

Abstract:

User participation in value co-creation is a crucial guarantee for the successful operation of online brand communities. Based on the Cognition-Affect-Conation (C-A-C) theoretical framework, this study constructs a theoretical model of the influencing factors of user value co-creation behavior in online brand communities from both cognitive and affective perspectives. The model is empirically tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), and multi-group analysis is employed to explore the differential effects across different types of platforms. The research findings reveal that information quality, interaction quality, and incentive mechanisms all have a significantly positive impact on user satisfaction, which in turn positively influences both autonomous value co-creation and sponsored value co-creation. User satisfaction plays a mediating role in this process. Meanwhile, normative mechanisms only exert a significantly positive effect on users' autonomous value co-creation and have no significant impact on sponsored value co-creation. Furthermore, there are differentiated effects between third-party platforms and official platforms in terms of users' autonomous value co-creation and sponsored value co-creation. Specifically, for autonomous value co-creation, the positive effects of information quality, interaction quality, and incentive mechanisms are more significant in third-party platform communities compared to official platform communities. Conversely, for sponsored value co-creation, the positive influence of perceptual factors is more significant in official platform communities than in third-party platform communities. These findings deepen the theoretical understanding of the formation mechanisms behind user value co-creation in different types of online brand communities and provide practical insights and references for the healthy and sustainable development of such communities.

Palabras clave:

cocreación de valor autónoma marco cognición-afecto-conación comunidad de marca en línea cocreación de valor patrocinada satisfacción del usuario

Más Videos Relacionados

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

Since the early 2000s, computer-mediated communication (CMC) has grown rapidly, playing a crucial role in self-development. A key distinction between CMC and real-life interactions is the lack of a physically present partner. This absence makes non-verbal cues such as facial expressions, body language, and paralinguistic signals unavailable in CMC platforms like email, instant messaging, or social media. The lack of these cues can create ambiguity and complicate how feedback is interpreted.The...

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Impact of Social Context on Individuals

Social psychology examines how the real or imagined presence of others influences individuals' thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. A key concept in this field is the role of social context in shaping behavior. The same individual may act differently depending on the social setting, due to the varying expectations and norms associated with each environment. This context-dependent behavior illustrates the influence of social roles, which prescribe appropriate conduct in specific situations.Social...

Group Polarization

Group Polarization

Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.

Spontaneity

Spontaneity

A spontaneous process is one that occurs naturally under certain conditions. A nonspontaneous process, on the other hand, will not take place unless it is “driven” by the continual input of energy from an external source. Processes have a natural tendency to occur in one direction under a given set of conditions. Water will naturally flow downhill (spontaneous process), but uphill flow (nonspontaneous process) requires outside intervention such as the use of a pump. Iron exposed to...