Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Binary Fission01:26

Binary Fission

2.5K
Binary fission is the primary mode of asexual reproduction in prokaryotes, such as bacteria. It results in the production of two genetically identical daughter cells. This highly efficient process ensures the rapid propagation of bacterial populations under favorable conditions and involves coordinated cellular and molecular events.DNA Replication and SeparationThe process begins with the replication of the bacterial chromosome. The circular DNA molecule unwinds at a specific origin of...
2.5K
Binary Fission01:20

Binary Fission

63.0K
Fission is the division of a single entity into two or more parts, which regenerate into separate entities that resemble the original. Organisms in the Archaea and Bacteria domains reproduce using binary fission, in which a parent cell splits into two parts that can each grow to the size of the original parent cell. This asexual method of reproduction produces cells that are all genetically identical.
63.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

11.0K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.0K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

1.2K
A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.2K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

18.4K
z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
18.4K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

45.5K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
45.5K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

How to evaluate probabilistic prediction models: key metrics.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026
Same author

Comparing variable and feature selection strategies for prediction - protocol of a simulation study in low-dimensional transplantation data.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Youden index and Tjur's R<sup>2</sup> in 2 × 2 tables.

Annals of epidemiology·2025
Same author

Mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic in the Swiss dialysis population beyond SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Clinical kidney journal·2024
Same author

Pitfalls in Valganciclovir Prophylaxis Dose Adjustment Based on Renal Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation·2024
Same author

Fast reactions with non-interacting species in stochastic reaction networks.

Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE·2022
Same journal

Measuring neurodevelopment in iron-deficient children in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of evidence and gaps.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Women's family planning status in Ethiopia: A geo-additive modeling approach.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Estimation of the global number of nicotine vapers in 2025" [Global Epidemiology 11 (2026) 100257].

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum regarding Missing disclaimer statement from Editor [in Chief] on the decision process in previously published articles.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

The first Turks and Caicos Islands global school health survey: Brief findings, challenges, lessons learned, and next steps.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Infection outbreaks caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: An epidemiological surveillance study in public hospitals in Chile, 2017-2024.

Global epidemiology·2026
Ver todos los artículos relacionados

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia
07:33

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia

Published on: May 21, 2010

37.2K

Sobre conceptos erróneos acerca de la puntuación de Brier en modelos de predicción binaria

Linard Hoessly1

  • 1Data Center of the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study, University hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Global epidemiology
|January 22, 2026
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

La puntuación de Brier, utilizada en la investigación sanitaria, a menudo se malinterpreta. Este estudio aclara sus propiedades, demostrando que refleja más que solo la precisión y guiando una interpretación adecuada para mejores decisiones de salud pública.

Palabras clave:
puntuación de Briermodelos de predicciónevaluación de modelossalud públicaepidemiología

Más Videos Relacionados

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.5K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Jan 23, 2026

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia
07:33

A Simple Composite Phenotype Scoring System for Evaluating Mouse Models of Cerebellar Ataxia

Published on: May 21, 2010

37.2K
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.7K
Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
08:50

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors

Published on: February 25, 2020

7.5K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Epidemiología
  • Bioestadística
  • Salud Pública

Sus antecedentes:

  • La puntuación de Brier es una métrica común para evaluar predicciones probabilísticas en la investigación sanitaria.
  • Las interpretaciones erróneas de la puntuación de Brier pueden conducir a evaluaciones de modelos y decisiones clínicas erróneas.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Aclarar los conceptos erróneos comunes en torno a la puntuación de Brier.
  • Proporcionar orientación para la interpretación precisa de las puntuaciones de Brier en modelos de predicción epidemiológica.

Principales métodos:

  • Examen analítico de las propiedades estadísticas de la puntuación de Brier.
  • Estudios de simulación en diversos escenarios (p. ej., distribución de probabilidad de resultados, tamaño de la muestra, prevalencia del evento).

Principales resultados:

  • Se identificaron cinco conceptos erróneos comunes sobre la puntuación de Brier.
  • Se demostró que incluso los modelos perfectos pueden producir puntuaciones de Brier distintas de cero.
  • La puntuación de Brier refleja la distribución del riesgo y la variación aleatoria, no solo la precisión de la predicción o la calibración.

Conclusiones:

  • Las comparaciones de la puntuación de Brier entre diferentes poblaciones o entornos pueden ser engañosas.
  • Se recomendó complementar la puntuación de Brier con métricas de calibración y medidas de utilidad.
  • Se enfatizó la restricción de las comparaciones de la puntuación de Brier a la misma población para una interpretación válida.