Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

4.7K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
4.7K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping02:05

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

36.2K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
36.2K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

6.0K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
6.0K
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification01:17

Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification

278
Self-verification is a fundamental psychological drive wherein individuals seek affirmation of their self-concept from others, striving for consistency between their internal self-view and external perceptions. This drive operates even when the self-concept is negative, influencing interpersonal behavior and feedback preferences in complex and often counterintuitive ways. Unlike the self-enhancement motive, which seeks positive evaluations, self-verification prioritizes coherence and...
278
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions01:29

Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions

219
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
219
Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

266
Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
266

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Impacts of physical and testimonial evidence on South Korean Police interrogator's selection of tactics.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2026
Same author

The Segmented Interview: Partitioning the Initial Free Recall Topics into Segments to Enhance Information Gathering and Lie Detection.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

All mouth and trousers? Use of the Devil's Advocate questioning protocol to determine authenticity of opinions about protester actions.

Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law·2024
Same author

Veracity Judgments Based on Complications: A Training Experiment.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same author

Introducing the high-context communication style interview protocol to detect deception in pairs.

Acta psychologica·2024
Same author

Successful use of the forced choice test for detecting concealment of semantic memory in criminal and intelligence investigations.

Frontiers in psychology·2024

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: May 5, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

7.8K

Evaluación de la mentira sobre opiniones mediante la ampliación del protocolo de entrevista del abogado del diablo

Sharon Leal1, Aldert Vrij1, Haneen Deeb1

  • 1School of Psychology, Sport & Health Sciences, University of Portsmouth, UK.

Acta psychologica
|January 22, 2026
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

El protocolo de entrevista del abogado del diablo detecta eficazmente el engaño en las opiniones. La adición de una misma declaración de ejemplo mejoró la distinción entre los veraces y los mentirosos basándose en la elocuencia y la pasión.

Palabras clave:
EngañoElocuenciaEntrevistaOpinionesMisma declaración de ejemplo

Más Videos Relacionados

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

7.8K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

14.3K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: May 5, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

7.8K
The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
06:51

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

7.8K
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

14.3K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Psicología
  • Psicología Forense
  • Detección del Engaño

Sus antecedentes:

  • El protocolo de entrevista del abogado del diablo está diseñado para detectar mentiras sobre opiniones.
  • Implica elicitar razones que apoyen una opinión y razones que se opongan a ella.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Investigar si la inclusión de 'una misma declaración de ejemplo' mejora la capacidad del protocolo del abogado del diablo para diferenciar entre veraces y mentirosos.
  • Evaluar el impacto de una declaración modelo en la detección del engaño en las opiniones expresadas.

Principales métodos:

  • 171 participantes (veraces y mentirosos) expresaron opiniones sobre temas sociales.
  • La mitad de los participantes vio 'una misma declaración de ejemplo' antes de su entrevista.
  • Las entrevistas evaluaron la elocuencia, la pasión y la predecibilidad en las respuestas a las solicitudes de opinión y del abogado del diablo.

Principales resultados:

  • El protocolo del abogado del diablo mostró diferencias en elocuencia y pasión entre los veraces y los mentirosos.
  • La condición de 'misma declaración de ejemplo' mejoró significativamente la efectividad del protocolo en la detección del engaño.
  • Se respaldaron las hipótesis relativas a una mayor elocuencia y pasión en los veraces.

Conclusiones:

  • El protocolo de entrevista del abogado del diablo es un método viable para detectar el engaño en las opiniones.
  • La incorporación de 'una misma declaración de ejemplo' mejora demostrablemente la precisión de este método de detección del engaño.
  • La elocuencia y la pasión son indicadores clave para distinguir las opiniones genuinas de las fabricadas.