Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.0K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.0K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

14.1K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
14.1K
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

889
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
889
Intelligence01:27

Intelligence

8.7K
The term "intelligence" is complex because it refers to both behavior and individuals, and its interpretation varies across cultures. European Americans tend to link intelligence with reasoning and cognitive skills, while in Kenya, it is tied to responsible participation in family and social life. In Uganda, intelligence is seen as the ability to know the right actions and carry them out effectively, while the Iatmul people of Papua New Guinea associate it with the capacity to remember...
8.7K
Guidelines for Sketching a Curve01:23

Guidelines for Sketching a Curve

155
Curve sketching is a systematic method for understanding the overall behavior of a function by analyzing its key mathematical features. A function defines a curve on the coordinate plane, where the horizontal axis represents the input variable and the vertical axis represents the output. The process begins by determining the domain, which specifies the set of input values for which the function is defined and establishes the horizontal extent of the graph.Intercepts with the horizontal and...
155
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.1K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.1K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

The use of antibiotic, probiotic, and FMT in modulating Immunotherapy Efficacy and Survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

The oncologist·2026
Same author

Dual role of intratumoral microbiota: From colorectal cancer progression to therapeutic opportunities.

Journal of translational internal medicine·2026
Same author

Unraveling cross-scale driving mechanisms of ecosystem services trade-offs for metropolitan sustainable management: Insight from a three-level hierarchical linear model.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same author

Circulating Tumor DNA is Associated With Pathologic Response and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Archivos de bronconeumologia·2026
Same author

Decoding nucleic acid modification regulatory networks: A key to cancer intervention and treatment.

Physics of life reviews·2026
Same author

Increased precipitation partially alleviates the carbon-water tradeoff under the Grain for Green program.

Environmental research·2026

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.5K

Lista de verificación STAGER: directrices estandarizadas de prueba y evaluación para valorar la fiabilidad de la

Jinghong Chen1,2, Lingxuan Zhu1, Weiming Mou1,3

  • 1Department of Oncology, Zhujiang Hospital Southern Medical University Guangzhou China.

iMetaOmics
|February 12, 2026
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

El desarrollo de directrices estandarizadas es esencial para evaluar la inteligencia artificial generativa (IA) en medicina. Este estudio presenta un marco integral y una lista de verificación para garantizar la evaluación fiable de las herramientas de IA en la atención sanitaria.

Palabras clave:
IA generativacontextos médicos y de ciencias de la vidafiabilidaddirectrices de evaluación estandarizadas

Más Videos Relacionados

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.5K
Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
08:58

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia

Published on: May 1, 2021

4.2K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Feb 13, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization
05:49

Author Spotlight: Advancing CBCT and Digital Dental Image Integration with AI-Assisted Digitization

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.5K
Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
06:37

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention

Published on: December 15, 2023

5.5K
Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia
08:58

Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Assessing Primary Cilia

Published on: May 1, 2021

4.2K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Informática Médica
  • Inteligencia Artificial
  • Tecnología Sanitaria

Sus antecedentes:

  • La inteligencia artificial generativa (IA) muestra una gran promesa en medicina, pero su implementación se ve obstaculizada por la falta de marcos de evaluación estandarizados y problemas metodológicos en la investigación actual.
  • La evaluación fiable y coherente de la IA generativa en la atención sanitaria requiere directrices de evaluación estandarizadas.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Desarrollar directrices estandarizadas y sólidas para evaluar el rendimiento de la IA generativa en aplicaciones médicas.
  • Proporcionar un enfoque sistemático para evaluar la utilidad y fiabilidad de la IA generativa en entornos sanitarios.

Principales métodos:

  • Se realizó una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura en Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed y Google Scholar, centándose en estudios que evalúan la IA generativa en medicina.
  • Un equipo multidisciplinario de expertos participó en sesiones de discusión para formular una lista de verificación detallada de 32 elementos.
  • El marco desarrollado cubre aspectos críticos de evaluación, incluida la formulación de preguntas, los métodos de consulta y las técnicas de evaluación.

Principales resultados:

  • Se creó una lista de verificación completa de 32 elementos y un marco de evaluación más amplio para guiar la evaluación de la IA generativa en contextos médicos.
  • El marco ofrece una vía clara desde el desarrollo de la pregunta inicial hasta la evaluación final de los resultados.
  • Aborda los desafíos potenciales y mejora la calidad y la presentación de informes de la investigación que involucra IA generativa en medicina.

Conclusiones:

  • El marco desarrollado proporciona un método estandarizado y sistemático para probar la aplicabilidad de la IA generativa en medicina.
  • Este enfoque tiene como objetivo mejorar la calidad de la investigación y la presentación de informes, facilitando el avance de la IA generativa en las ciencias médicas y de la vida.
  • Las directrices son cruciales para garantizar la evaluación fiable y coherente de las herramientas de IA generativa en la atención sanitaria.