Sensores de Resonancia de Plasmón Superficial Acoplados por Red de Iluminación de Doble Cara Utilizando Discos Ópticos Directos
Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Feb 14, 2026

Engineering Antiviral Agents via Surface Plasmon Resonance
Published on: June 14, 2022
Wisansaya Jaikeandee1, Asad Ullah Hil Gulib1, Taeyul Choi1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76207, USA.
Abstract:
Commercial optical discs are used as low-cost grating substrates for fabricating grating-coupled surface plasmon resonance (GC-SPR) sensors, and the effects of front-side and back-side illumination are systematically compared. Three different discs were used as grating substrates with grating periods (Λ) of 322 ± 5.2 nm for BD-R, 805 ± 7.5 nm for DVD-R, and 1.582 ± 0.013 µm for CD-R. Silver (Ag) and copper (Cu) films were deposited by magnetron sputtering to form plasmonic gratings. The shallow grating height of BD-R supported continuous metal coverage, while the deeper DVD-R and CD-R grooves resulted in a less continuous layer. Plasmonic responses were measured using wavelength-modulated SPR spectroscopy and predicted with rigorous coupled wave analysis (RCWA). Ag-coated gratings produced sharper and more clearly identifiable resonances than Cu-coated gratings, which exhibited broader due to stronger damping. Front-side illumination produced stronger and more reproducible SPR excitation across all disc types, whereas back-side illumination resulted in more complex spectra as light propagates through the polycarbonate layer. Refractive index sensitivities based using Ag-coated discs of 394, 321, and 290 nm/RIU were obtained for CD-R, BD-R, and DVD-R, respectively. The results clarify the influence of fabrication strategy, illumination geometry, and disc grating geometry on resonance quality and sensitivity in low-cost optical disc-based GC-SPR sensors.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
Double Resonance Techniques: Overview
Spin decoupling is usually achieved by...
Resonance
G-protein Coupled Receptors
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

