Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: May 2, 2026
Direct Re-implantation of Left Coronary Artery into the Aorta in Adults with Anomalous Origin of Left Coronary Artery from the Pulmonary Artery ALCAPA
Published on: April 24, 2017
Revascularización de la Arteria Subclavia Izquierda en el Reemplazo del Arco Aórtico: Patencia Comparativa de la
Yoshiyuki Tokuda1, Masao Yamada1, Tomonari Uemura1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Objectives:
Revascularization of the left subclavian artery (LSCA) is routinely required during total aortic arch replacement. In situ reconstruction may be technically difficult in cases with large aneurysms or posterior vessel displacement. Extra-anatomic aorto-axillary bypass has been proposed as an alternative, but its long-term patency relative to in situ repair remains uncertain. This study compared LSCA patency between the two techniques.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 436 consecutive patients (median age 69.0 years [interquartile range (IQR) 62.0-75.0]; 347 men) who underwent total arch replacement with LSCA revascularization: 240 in situ and 196 extra-anatomic. Postoperative CT imaging (1,853 scans; median 3 [IQR 1-6] per patient) was reviewed to determine immediate and long-term patency. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for time-to-event comparison. A small descriptive subgroup of 18 patients undergoing concomitant left internal thoracic artery (LITA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) bypass was also reviewed.
Results:
Perioperative outcomes, including mortality and major complications, were similar between groups. Subclavian wound infection occurred in three extra-anatomic cases (1.5%), all managed successfully with local care. Immediate LSCA patency was higher after extra-anatomic bypass (100% vs 92.9%, p < 0.001). At five years, patency remained superior with extra-anatomic bypass (97.7% vs 87.8%; log-rank p = 0.0002).In the descriptive LITA-LAD subgroup, CT follow-up demonstrated 100% LSCA and LITA graft patency; however, interpretation is limited by the small sample size.
Conclusions:
Compared with in situ reconstruction, extra-anatomic LSCA bypass provides equivalent perioperative safety and superior long-term patency. These findings support extra-anatomic bypass as a reliable and technically straightforward option for LSCA revascularization during total arch replacement.
