Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Feb 20, 2026
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Evaluación psicométrica del Diario de Síntomas de la Enfermedad Celíaca 2.1© utilizando datos del Estudio Virtual de
Sonal Ghura1, Dawn Wiese Adams2, Marilyn G Geller3
1Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Purpose:
Validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are required for use in clinical trials of celiac disease (CeD) therapies. The Celiac Disease Symptom Diary 2.1© (CDSD 2.1©), which measures the daily severity of core CeD symptoms (abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, nausea, tiredness), was developed according to the latest regulatory guidelines for fit-for-purpose PROMs. This study evaluated the psychometric properties of CDSD 2.1.
Methods:
Psychometric properties of CDSD 2.1 were evaluated using data from a 12-week US observational study, the Virtual Celiac Symptoms Study (NCT05309330), in patients with CeD maintaining a gluten-free diet. Participants completed CDSD 2.1 daily and other PROMs (Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGIS], Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale [GSRS], and Celiac Symptom Index [CSI]) at specified time points to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of CDSD 2.1.
Results:
Overall, 480 participants (338 adults, 142 adolescents) completed the study. Cronbach's alpha (baseline = 0.77 adults/adolescents) indicated high internal consistency reliability of weekly average gastrointestinal (GI; abdominal pain, bloating, nausea, diarrhea) CDSD 2.1 scores. An intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89 (adults)/0.88 (adolescents) demonstrated high test-retest reliability among stable patients on PGIS. Moderate-to-strong correlations between weekly average GI CDSD 2.1 scores and GSRS domains at baseline and CSI at Week 3 confirmed construct validity (r = 0.44-0.76; p<0.05). Weekly average GI CDSD 2.1 score changes followed expected patterns based on PGIS change groups, demonstrating responsiveness.
Conclusion:
This evaluation provides evidence to support the use of CDSD 2.1 in clinical trials as a reliable and responsive measure of CeD symptom severity.
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
01:29Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
01:17Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
01:30Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are: