Video Experimental Relacionado
Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Un enfoque práctico para el manejo de las complicaciones de la intervención coronaria percutánea
Tanawat Attachaipanich1, Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk2, Muzamil Khawaja3
1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Introduction:
Despite advances in stent design, pharmacotherapy, and procedural techniques that have improved percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes and reduced PCI-related complications, these events still occur and are associated with adverse outcomes. Moreover, complex PCI procedures, which predispose to increased risk of complications, are increasingly performed. Understanding risk factors, underlying mechanisms, evidence-based management, and preventive strategies are essential to optimize procedural outcomes. This review aims to summarize current evidence and highlight gaps in knowledge related to PCI-associated complications.
Methods:
This narrative review used a focused PubMed search through October 2025, prioritizing randomized trials, large observational studies, guidelines, and consensus statements.
Results:
Acute vessel closure, which most commonly results from dissection or thrombosis and perforation are frequently associated with hemodynamic compromise and increased procedural mortality. Device-related complications such as entrapment and fracture, although rare, can potentially lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Preventive strategies emphasize appropriate lesion preparation, proper device selection and sizing, gentle manipulation, and the use of adjunctive imaging modalities such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography to minimize risk. Early recognition and prompt management of these complications are essential to decreased adverse outcomes of PCI in both short and long term. However, due to the low incidence of these events, current management strategies are largely based on case reports, observational studies, and expert consensus.
Conclusions:
Future large-scale studies and registry data, along with artificial intelligence-guided risk modeling are warranted to facilitate individualized prediction, enhance procedural safety, and advance precision management across preprocedural, intraprocedural and postprocedural phases.
Más Videos Relacionados
Videos de Conceptos Relacionados
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management

