Jove
Visualize
Contáctanos
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ACERCA DE JoVE
Visión GeneralLiderazgoBlogCentro de Ayuda JoVE
AUTORES
Proceso de PublicaciónConsejo EditorialAlcance y PolíticasRevisión por ParesPreguntas FrecuentesEnviar
BIBLIOTECARIOS
TestimoniosSuscripcionesAccesoRecursosConsejo Asesor de BibliotecasPreguntas Frecuentes
INVESTIGACIÓN
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchivo
EDUCACIÓN
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualCentro de Recursos para ProfesoresSitio de Profesores
Términos y Condiciones de Uso
Política de Privacidad
Políticas

Videos de Conceptos Relacionados

Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

15.2K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.2K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.7K
3.7K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.1K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.1K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.1K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

11.6K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
11.6K
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction01:14

NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction

1.1K
When magnetic nuclei in a sample achieve resonance and undergo relaxation, the signal detected in NMR is an approximately exponential free induction decay. Fourier transform of an exponential decay yields a Lorentzian peak in the frequency domain. Lorentzian peaks in an NMR spectrum are defined by their amplitude, full width at half maximum, and position, where the peak width is governed by the spin-spin relaxation time alone. In real experiments, however, the applied magnetic field is rendered...
1.1K

También podría leer

Artículos Relacionados

Artículos vinculados a este trabajo por autores compartidos, revista y gráfico de citas.

Ordenar por
Same author

Correction: Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

JMIR formative research·2026
Same author

Characterization of Post-Viral Infection Behaviors Among Patients With Long COVID: Prospective, Observational, Longitudinal Cohort Analyses of Fitbit Data and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

JMIR formative research·2025
Same author

Rapid development of a registry to accelerate COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same author

Rapid Development of a Registry to Accelerate COVID-19 Vaccine Clinical Trials.

Research square·2024
Same author

A randomized controlled trial of generic and localized MedlinePlus-based information resources for hard-to-reach urban Hispanic community.

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA·2022
Same author

Why does age at HIV infection correlate with set point viral load? An evolutionary hypothesis.

Epidemics·2022

Video Experimental Relacionado

Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.2K

Detección de Errores de Referencia en la Literatura Científica con Modelos de Lenguaje Grandes

Tianmai M Zhang1, Neil F Abernethy1

  • 1Department of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
|February 23, 2026
PubMed
Resumen
Este resumen es generado por máquina.

Los modelos de lenguaje grandes pueden detectar errores de citación en artículos científicos, incluso con información limitada. Este avance de la IA ayuda a garantizar la integridad de la literatura científica y la difusión precisa de la información.

Palabras clave:
Modelos de lenguaje grandesProcesamiento del lenguaje naturalInteligencia artificialIntegridad científicaErrores de citación

Más Videos Relacionados

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.8K

Videos de Experimentos Relacionados

Last Updated: Feb 24, 2026

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness
03:14

Augmenting Large Language Models via Vector Embeddings to Improve Domain-Specific Responsiveness

Published on: December 6, 2024

1.2K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.7K
Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment
06:48

Lexical Decision Task for Studying Written Word Recognition in Adults with and without Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: June 25, 2019

9.8K

Área de la Ciencia:

  • Inteligencia Artificial
  • Publicación académica
  • Integridad científica

Sus antecedentes:

  • Los errores de referencia, como los errores de citación y cita, son prevalentes en las publicaciones científicas.
  • Estos errores pueden propagar información errónea y son difíciles de identificar manualmente, lo que amenaza la integridad de la literatura científica.
  • Se necesitan métodos de detección automatizados para abordar estos desafíos.

Objetivo del estudio:

  • Evaluar la eficacia de los modelos de lenguaje grandes (LLM) en la detección de errores de cita en artículos científicos.
  • Evaluar el rendimiento de los LLM con diferentes niveles de información contextual a través de la mejora de la recuperación.

Principales métodos:

  • Desarrollo de un conjunto de datos anotado por expertos que comprende pares de declaraciones-referencias de artículos de revistas, con un componente biomédico significativo.
  • Evaluación de la familia de modelos de lenguaje grandes GPT de OpenAI en este conjunto de datos.
  • Prueba de LLM en diversos entornos, incluidos aquellos con datos de referencia limitados.

Principales resultados:

  • Los modelos de lenguaje grandes demostraron una notable capacidad para identificar citas erróneas.
  • Se logró una detección eficaz incluso con información contextual restringida y sin ajuste fino del modelo.
  • El estudio valida el potencial de la IA para apoyar los procesos de escritura y revisión científica.

Conclusiones:

  • Los modelos de lenguaje grandes muestran potencial para detectar automáticamente errores de referencia en la literatura científica.
  • Las herramientas de IA pueden ayudar a mantener la precisión y la confiabilidad de la investigación publicada.
  • Esta investigación contribuye a aprovechar la IA para mejorar la comunicación científica y garantizar la base fáctica.