Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR SEROTONIN AND HISTAMINE ABNORMALITIES.

A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
Same author

The interrelationship of complement-activation fragments and angiogenesis-related factors in early pregnancy and their association with pre-eclampsia.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2010
Same author

Crossbridge and backbone structure of invertebrate thick filaments.

Biophysical journal·2009
Same author

Effect of breastfeeding on cognitive development of infants born small for gestational age.

Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)·2002
Same author

Demystifying central review boards: current options and future directions.

IRB·2002
Same author

No evidence for lipid peroxidation in severe preeclampsia.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2001

関連する実験動画

Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

メタアナリシスと,その後の大規模対照試験の間の不一致を解決する.

R DerSimonian1, R J Levine

  • 1Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Development, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510, USA. DerSimonian@nih.gov

JAMA
|October 12, 1999
PubMed
まとめ

カルシウム補給は,高リスクの健康な女性では妊娠前出血症を予防する可能性があるが,低リスクの女性ではそうではない. 高リスクグループにおける有効性を確認するためにさらなる研究が必要である. 妊産前出血栓症の予防は,依然として研究対象分野である.

科学分野:

  • 産婦人科と産婦人科を担当しています.
  • 栄養科学とは,栄養科学である.
  • 臨床流行病学 臨床流行病学とは

背景:

  • メタアナリシスによると,カルシウムサプリメントは妊娠前出血症を効果的に防ぐことが示されています.
  • NIH Calcium for Preeclampsia Prevention (CPEP) 試験では,健康なヌリポラスの女性ではリスクが低下していないことが判明しました.
  • 研究間の不一致は,出産前不妊症の予防におけるカルシウムの役割に関するさらなる調査を必要とします.

研究 の 目的:

  • メタアナリシスとCPEP試験の矛盾する結果を調和させるため.
  • 効果の異質性の研究不一致に対する影響を評価する.
  • 妊娠前出血症の予防のためのカルシウム補給の有効性を評価する.

主な方法:

  • 1997年7月10日以前に出版された英語記事の体系的な文献レビュー.
  • 妊娠前出血症とカルシウムサプリメントに関するデータを報告した試験を含む.
  • 14件の試験の分析,プラセボ対照群とリスク集団 (高リスク対低リスク) による層分化.

主要な成果:

  • 試験全体で実質的な異質性が見られた (P = .001).

さらに関連する動画

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2026

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese
08:08

Comparing the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in Chinese

Published on: April 1, 2016

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks
08:32

Examining Online Syntactic Processing of Spoken Complex Sentences in Chinese Using Dual-Modal Interference Tasks

Published on: September 5, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

  • 低リスク集団を対象としたプラセボ対照試験では,カルシウムは有意な効果を示さなかった (RR,0.79;P = .30),CPEP試験の結果と一致した.
  • 健康な高リスク集団では,カルシウムは強い利点を示唆した (RR,0.19;P = .001),しかし,サンプルサイズが小さくて (n=225) データが一貫していないため,結果は曖昧であった.
  • 結論:

    • 健康な高リスク集団における妊娠前出血症の予防のためのカルシウム補給の有効性は,さらなる調査を必要としています.
    • 単一の要約指標は,有意な異質性を持つメタ分析では不十分です.
    • 異質性を減らすための共変数を特定することは,治療戦略の最適化に不可欠です.