観察研究におけるバイアスと因果関係
David A Grimes1, Kenneth F Schulz
1Family Health International, PO Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. dgrimes@fhi.org
Lancet (London, England)
|January 29, 2002
まとめ
内部および外部有効性を理解することは,医学研究において極めて重要です. この要約では,選択,情報,および混同などのバイアスを識別し,軽減し,正確な研究結果を確保する方法について説明します.
科学分野:
- エピデミオロジー エピデミオロジー
- 医学研究方法論 医学研究方法論
背景:
- 医学文献の解釈には,内外的な妥当性を評価することが必要です.
- 内部有効性は,研究が意図された結果を測定することを保証します.
- 外部有効性は,研究結果の患者集団への一般化に関するものです.
研究 の 目的:
- 医学研究における有効性の重要な概念を定義し,区別する.
- 観察的研究におけるバイアスの一般的な原因を概説する.
- 混同を制御し,因果関係を評価するための方法を提供すること.
主な方法:
- 内部有効性の脅威に関する議論:選択バイアス,情報バイアス,および混乱.
- バイアスの種類についての説明:差異的および非差異的誤分類.
- 混同制御戦略の概要:制限,マッチング,階層化,および多変量技術.
主要な成果:
- 選択バイアスは,比較できないグループから生じます.
- 情報のバイアスは,不正確な暴露や結果の決定から生じる.
- 混同は,第3の要因が曝露と結果の関係を歪めるときに発生します.
結論:
- 読者は,偶然を考慮する前に,潜在的なバイアスの研究を批判的に評価する必要があります.
- 時間の順序,関連性の強さ,および用量反応などの基準を評価することは,因果的推論を支持します.
- 偽,間接,および因果関係を区別することは,有効な医学的な結論のために不可欠です.
関連する概念動画
Naturalistic Observations
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Cause and Effect
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
Bias
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Odds Ratio
The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
Correspondence Bias
Correspondence bias, also referred to as the fundamental attribution error, describes the tendency to attribute another person’s behavior to internal characteristics rather than situational influences. This cognitive bias leads individuals to overlook external factors that may be influencing actions, thereby fostering potentially inaccurate assessments of others’ intentions and dispositions.Empirical Evidence for Correspondence BiasResearch has consistently demonstrated the prevalence of...
Actor-Observer Effect
The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...


