Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
Longitudinal Research02:20

Longitudinal Research

Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Chi-square Analysis02:46

Chi-square Analysis

The chi-square test is a statistical hypothesis test. It is used to check whether there is a significant difference between an expected value and an observed value. In the context of genetics, it enables us to either accept or reject a hypothesis, based on how much the observed values deviate from the expected values.
The chi-square test was developed by Pearson in 1990.
The first step of performing a Chi-square analysis is to establish a null hypothesis, which assumes that there is no real...
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Overcoming the research to policy gap.

The Lancet. Global health·2019
Same author

India and Pakistan: a plea for sanity.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: Has global health lost it?

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: UK citizens are losing the right to health-who cares?

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Offline: General practice-changing the laws of nature.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same author

Countdown Global Mental Health 2030.

Lancet (London, England)·2019
Same journal

Online Prescribing of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Using AI Disagreement to Expose Gaps in Coverage Rules.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Randomized Trials in Pregnancy.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

Randomized Trials in Pregnancy-Reply.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

WHO Issues Guidelines for Treating Ebola and Marburg Viruses.

JAMA·2026
Same journal

FDA Approves Additional Naloxone Nasal Spray for Opioid Overdose.

JAMA·2026
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: May 12, 2026

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
05:40

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper

Published on: October 4, 2019

隠された研究論文

Richard Horton1

  • 1The Lancet, 32 Jamestown Rd, London NW1 78Y, England. richard.horton@lancet.com

JAMA
|June 1, 2002
PubMed
まとめ
この要約は機械生成です。

研究論文は,しばしば科学者の真の意見を表現できず,批判的な洞察や多様な見解を除外しています. この研究は,科学的報告の正確性を向上させるために,構造的な議論の必要性を強調しています.

キーワード:
生物医学および行動研究経験的アプローチである.

さらに関連する動画

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

関連する実験動画

Last Updated: May 12, 2026

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
05:40

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper

Published on: October 4, 2019

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement (PMSM), for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging
05:45

Uncovering Hidden Dynamics of Natural Photonic Structures Using Holographic Imaging

Published on: March 31, 2022

科学分野:

  • 医学研究 医学研究
  • 科学的出版物 科学的出版物
  • 研究の整合性 研究の整合性

背景:

  • 投稿者の意見の表現として,公表された研究結果の正確性を評価する.
  • 記載された結果と著者のコンセンサスとの間の潜在的な不一致を調査する.

研究 の 目的:

  • 研究論文が,報告された研究に関する寄稿者の意見を正確に反映しているかどうかを判断する.
  • 科学的出版物における排除された批判や曖昧な意味の事例を特定する.

主な方法:

  • ランセット誌の10件の研究記事で54人の貢献者からの調査回答の質的分析.
  • 研究に関連する質問に対する貢献者の回答と,公表された研究報告書の比較.

主要な成果:

  • 回答者の67%が回答し,多くの方が論文に載っていない弱点を認めた.
  • 発見の重要性と意味について,貢献者の間で大きな意見の相違がある.
  • 出版されたレポートは,多くの場合,さまざまな貢献者の意見を除外し,体系的な議論が欠けていました.

結論:

  • 研究論文は,めったに,貢献者の意見の全スペクトルを捉えることができません.
  • 証拠は,自己検閲された批判と科学的な執筆における曖昧な意味を示唆している.
  • 構成された議論のセクションと,貢献者の多元性を含める方法を探求することを推奨します.