歪んだ四面体幾何学における低スピンコバルト ((II)) システムの解明
David M Jenkins1, Angel J Di Bilio, Matthew J Allen
1Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Arnold and Mabel Beckman Laboratories of Chemical Synthesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.
Journal of the American Chemical Society
|December 19, 2002
まとめ
この研究では,ユニークな[PhBP(3) ]リガンドを持つ新しいコバルト (II) 複合体を導入し,擬似四面体構造における二重基底状態と三重基底状態の二次元形態における前例のない二重基底状態を明らかにしています. これらの発見は,コバルトの複雑な電子特性の理解を進める.
科学分野:
- 協調化化学について
- 有機金属化学 有機金属化学
- 無機化学 無機化学とは
背景:
- 二価コバルト (II) 複合体の電子的および構造的性質の調査は,それらの反応性と潜在的な応用を理解するために重要である.
- 金属中心の電子構成に強いフィールド,アニオン型トリス ((phosphine)) ドナーリガンドの影響は,依然として活発な研究分野です.
- 4座標コバルト ((II) 複合体と二重基底状態に関する以前の研究は,主に正方形平面幾何学に焦点を当てていました.
研究 の 目的:
- [PhBP (III) ]リガンドを含む新しい二価コバルト (II) 複合体を合成し,特徴づけること.
- 強いフィールド,アニオン型トリス ((phosphine)) ドナーリガンドから生じる構造的および電子的現象を探求する.
- これらのコバルト複合体の基本状態のスピン構成と溶液の振る舞いを調査する.
主な方法:
- コバルト (II) コンプレックスと[PhBP (III) ]リガンドの合成.
- X線微分法による固体構造の特徴化.
- SQUID,EPR,光学スペクトロスコピーを含むスペクトロスコピー分析.
- モノマー/ダイマー均衡とスピン状態を決定するための溶液状態の研究.
主要な成果:
- 擬四面体コバルト (II) 複合体[PhBP (III) ]CoIは珍しい二重基底状態を示している.
- ディメリックブロミドとクロライド複合体 ([PhBP(3) ]Co(mu-X))(2) は,固体状態では三重基底状態を示しますが,溶液では単体低スピン種として存在します.
- 酸化研究は,リガンドの改変と高スピンコバルト (II) 複合体の形成を明らかにしています.
- [PhBP(3) ]リガンドは強いリガンド場と軸歪みを誘導し,モノメリック複合体における二重基底状態を好みます.
結論:
- [PhBP(3) ]リガンドは,二価コバルト複合体に独特で強力なリガンドフィールドを与え,他のフォスフィンまたはボラートリガンドとは異なる.
- 強いリガンドフィールドと[PhBP(3) ]リガンドによる軸歪みの組み合わせは,擬似四面体コバルト ((II) 複合体における異常な二重基底状態へのアクセスを可能にします.
- これらの発見は,協調化学におけるスピン状態制御の理解を拡大し,コバルトベースの材料の設計のための新しい道を提供しています.
関連する概念動画
Valence Bond Theory
Coordination compounds and complexes exhibit different colors, geometries, and magnetic behavior, depending on the metal atom/ion and ligands from which they are composed. In an attempt to explain the bonding and structure of coordination complexes, Linus Pauling proposed the valence bond theory, or VBT, using the concepts of hybridization and the overlapping of the atomic orbitals. According to VBT, the central metal atom or ion (Lewis acid) hybridizes to provide empty orbitals of suitable...
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
Crystal Field Theory
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Tetrahedral Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Colors and Magnetism
Color in Coordination Complexes
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...


