関連する実験動画
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

06:41
Assessment of Social Interaction Behaviors
Published on: February 25, 2011
マカクの前帯状回転が社会的評価において果たす役割
P H Rudebeck1, M J Buckley, M E Walton
1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK. peter.rudebeck@psy.ox.ac.uk
まとめ
オスのマカクの前帯状回に損傷すると,他者に対する社会的関心が乱されます. 軌道前頭皮質の病変は,主に恐怖刺激に対する反応に影響し,ACCの損傷が社会的相互作用の変化を引き起こすことを示唆しています.
科学分野:
- 神経科学は神経科学である.
- 霊長類の行動
- ソーシャル・コグニションとは
背景:
- 人間の前頭葉の損傷は,得られた社会病に繋がり,複雑な社会的相互作用に影響を及ぼします.
- 前帯状皮質 (ACC) と軌道前帯状皮質 (OFC) を含む前頭葉の特定の領域は,社会的行動に関与しています.
研究 の 目的:
- マカクの社会的相互作用パターンにおける前帯状回転と軌道前頭皮質の役割を調査する.
- これらの同類の脳領域の病変が,前頭葉の損傷を持つヒトで観察された社会的欠陥を複製するかどうかを判断する.
主な方法:
- 手術による病変は,雄のマカクの前帯状回転と軌道前頭皮質の部分に作られました.
- 他のマカク (雄・雌) に対する社会的関心に対するこれらの病変の影響を観察し,分析した.
- 軽度の恐怖を誘発する刺激に対する反応は,軌道前頭皮質の損傷の後に評価された.
主要な成果:
- 前帯状回膜の病変は,雄のマカクの他の個体に対する社会的関心パターンを著しく変えました.
- 軌道前頭皮質の病変は,主に軽度の恐怖誘発刺激に対する反応に影響し,一般的な社会的関心に対する影響は少ない.
- これらの発見は,社会的行動と恐怖の処理におけるACCとOFCの特定の役割を区別する.
結論:
- 前帯状回は,同種の動物に対する正常な社会的関心を維持する上で重要な役割を果たします.
- 前帯状回膜の損傷は,前頭葉の損傷後に観察された社会的相互作用の変化を裏付けている可能性があります.
- 軌道前頭皮質は,一般的な社会的関与よりも,恐怖に関連する刺激を処理することにより関与しているようです.
関連する概念動画
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
Social Scripts
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter), the opening...
Social Exchange Theory
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Social Traps
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...
Social Facilitation
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Social Exchange Theory
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

