Jove
Visualize
お問い合わせ
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
JoVEについて
概要リーダーシップブログJoVEヘルプセンター
著者向け
出版プロセス編集委員会範囲と方針査読よくある質問投稿
図書館員向け
推薦の声購読アクセスリソース図書館諮問委員会よくある質問
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experimentsアーカイブ
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教員リソースセンター教員サイト
利用規約
プライバシーポリシー
ポリシー

関連する概念動画

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...

こちらも読む

関連記事

共著者、ジャーナル、引用グラフによってこの研究に関連する記事。

並び替え
Same author

Nuclear reactor safety.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1985
関連記事をすべて見る

関連する実験動画

Updated: Jul 12, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
07:36

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

科学と社会に関するエッセイ:ポリグラフ検査とDOE国立研究所

S Aftergood

    Science (New York, N.Y.)
    |August 31, 2007
    PubMed
    まとめ

    新しいセキュリティ政策により,米国国立研究所でポリグラフ検査を行うことが義務付けられており,その科学的妥当性や,研究室の活力への潜在的な影響に関する議論が起こっています. 反対派は,ポリグラフ検査に疑問を投げかけている.

    科学分野:

    • 国家安全保障 国家安全保障
    • 法医学科学は,法医科学の分野である.
    • 公共政策 公共政策 公共政策

    背景:

    • 最近の議会の命令により,米国国立研究所のスタッフのポリグラフ検査が義務付けられています.
    • この方針は,これらの施設内のセキュリティの欠陥を特定した後に制定されました.
    • この委任は大きな論争と議論を巻き起こしてきた.

    研究 の 目的:

    • 米国国立研究所の新ポリグラフ検査方針に関する論争を調査する.
    • 政策の支持者や反対者の主張を検証する.
    • この政策が科学界と研究信義に及ぼす潜在的な影響を評価する.

    主な方法:

    • このエッセイでは,既存の文献と政策文書をレビューしています.
    • ポリグラフ技術の科学的妥当性に関する議論を分析しています.
    • 報告書は,国家研究室に対する潜在的な社会経済的および運用的影響を検討している.

    主要な成果:

    • ポリグラフ検査の科学的妥当性は,反対者によって疑問視されています.
    • この政策が,国家研究所の運用効率とモラルを損なう可能性があるという懸念がある.
    • この政策の実施は,安全保障のニーズと科学の自由のバランスをとるという疑問を投げかけている.

    さらに関連する動画

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
    07:32

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

    Published on: February 10, 2016

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
    08:33

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

    Published on: September 4, 2019

    関連する実験動画

    Last Updated: Jul 12, 2026

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
    07:36

    An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

    Published on: May 3, 2016

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
    07:32

    Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

    Published on: February 10, 2016

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
    08:33

    A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

    Published on: September 4, 2019

    結論:

    • この論争は,国家安全保障の必須事項と科学研究の原則の間の重大な緊張を強調している.
    • この文脈におけるポリグラフ検査の有効性と影響に関するさらなる調査が必要である.
    • 米国国立研究所の活力と生産性に対する長期的な影響は,依然として大きな懸念事項です.